User talk:SassyDiva88

March 2018
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

I noticed your recent edit to 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake does not have an edit summary.&#32;Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks! Dawnseeker2000 22:17, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

April 2018
Three times (,, and ) you have added quite insignificant trivia at 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake, and each time I have reverted it (with a brief explanaion in the edit summary). You are new here, so you have a LOT to learn, but right off the bat you should know: do not persist in behavior that keeps getting undone. That is edit warring, and can result in sanctioning. In general the proper response to a reversion is to discuss the matter, a process we refer to as "WP:BRD". (Read it!). In this case, though, what you keep trying to add is just too insignificant for inclusion. (Something else to know: Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information.) Please desist. &diams; J. Johnson (JJ) (talk) 23:32, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

P.S. Again, at, prompting the following comments. &diams; J. Johnson (JJ) (talk) 21:45, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Binksternet (talk) 03:54, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Babysitters Beware
Hello, SassyDiva88. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Babysitters Beware, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:


 * 1) [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit edit the page]
 * 2) remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

 Onel 5969  TT me 12:12, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

August 2018
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Twin films has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:00, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Twin films was changed by SassyDiva88 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.878884 on 2018-08-18T18:00:11+00:00.

Deletion discussion about Babysitters Beware
Hello, SassyDiva88,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Babysitters Beware should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Babysitters Beware.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

 Onel 5969  TT me 17:10, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Babysitters Beware


A tag has been placed on Babysitters Beware requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

"page was previously deleted via PROD"

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 17:33, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

AfD removal
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Babysitters Beware. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you.  Onel 5969  TT me 04:02, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

September 2018
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Run-Around (Blues Traveler song), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Please also see WP:IPCV. DonIago (talk) 14:56, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Run-Around (Blues Traveler song). This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. As per my last note, please review WP:IPCV, and please be aware that IMDb is not considered a reliable source per WP:RS/IMDb. DonIago (talk) 15:46, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Babysitters Beware
Hello SassyDiva88,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Babysitters Beware for deletion, because it seems to be an article that was previously deleted by a consensus decision.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

 Onel 5969  TT me 10:44, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Babysitters Beware


A tag has been placed on Babysitters Beware, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Shirt58 (talk) 02:14, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Babysitters Beware


Hello, SassyDiva88. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Babysitters Beware".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:07, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

August 2021
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Twin films, you may be blocked from editing. JesseRafe (talk) 13:52, 12 August 2021 (UTC)