User talk:Sasypanoo

February 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Kıvanç Tatlıtuğ has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Kıvanç Tatlıtuğ was changed by Sasypanoo (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.901557 on 2014-02-14T10:31:14+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:31, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sexy Girl. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators can block users from editing if they repeatedly vandalize. Epicgenius (talk) 13:25, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Fawad Afzal Khan, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Fawad Afzal Khan was changed by Sasypanoo (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.948396 on 2014-02-21T14:55:05+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:55, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Kareena Kapoor Khan with this edit, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.  Puffin  Let's talk! 14:55, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. — Kralizec! (talk) 19:53, 21 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Also, as you might well be aware, there is no such thing here as a secured page. All pages, except a few which are protected and not accessible to you, are open to all editors. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 14:40, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
 * And there is no guideline or policy on article length; shortening an article for no reason except that you personally think it is too long is wholly unacceptable.--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 14:45, 23 February 2014 (UTC)