User talk:Satchidanan

Proposed deletion of Aditya J Patwardhan


The article Aditya J Patwardhan has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Case of WP:TOOSOON. Only has done short films.  Besides a Times of India articles about him, only can find social media type refs, which don't count.  Needs reliable refs about him.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bgwhite (talk) 05:01, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 27 May
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
 * On the Aditya J Patwardhan page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=722314093 your edit] caused a URL error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F722314093%7CAditya J Patwardhan%5D%5D Ask for help])

January 2017
Hello, I'm Worldbruce. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Jahangir seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Academics often disagree about the reason something happened. Wikipedia tries to explain all sides in due proportion, citing reliable sources, without favoring any one interpretation. For historical subjects, also consider the points raised in the essay "Identifying reliable sources (history)". --Worldbruce (talk) 17:30, 8 January 2017 (UTC)