User talk:Sathishanandsanthanakrishnan

Welcome!

 * }

January 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Vairamuthu has been reverted. Your edit here to Vairamuthu was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.facebook.com/Poetvairamuthu) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 19:26, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Vairamuthu, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=470492405 here]. Edinburgh  Wanderer  20:14, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Hello Sathishanandsanthanakrishnan. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Vairamuthu, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about following the reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Edinburgh  Wanderer  20:16, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Notice of discussion at the Administrators' Noticeboard
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Edinburgh  Wanderer  20:52, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Sathishanandsanthanakrishnan


A tag has been placed on User:Sathishanandsanthanakrishnan, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ukexpat (talk) 20:59, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Sathishanandsanthanakrishnan


A tag has been placed on User:Sathishanandsanthanakrishnan, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ukexpat (talk) 21:25, 9 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Please see WP:UP for guidance as to the appropriate use of user pages. – ukexpat (talk) 21:26, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Contested deletion
This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (your reason here) --Sathishanandsanthanakrishnan (talk) 21:27, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

this is the factual information about me and iam gone include all the facts as external links...


 * Improper use of user page, see above. – ukexpat (talk) 21:33, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

blocked
I'm afraid I have felt it necessary to block this account. Your actions and edit summaries make it clear that you are here for promotional purposes and that you do not understand that Wikipedia is not the place for such things. You also seem not to understand that you do not own any Wikipedia page. All pages, including your user page, are part of the project. Although some leeway is given in userspace promotional editing is not permitted anywhere. And of course your orders in your edit summaries that nobody is allowed to modify anything you edit show a complete lack of comprehension of Wikipedia's open editing model. Every time you make an edit, there is a notice at the bottom of the window informing you that if you do not want your "writing to be used, edited and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here" This is one of the five pillars of Wikipedia and no article is exempt from it.

If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:34, 9 January 2012 (UTC)