User talk:Satish672

Speedy deletion nomination of सतीश कुमार शर्मा
Hello Satish672,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged सतीश कुमार शर्मा for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. WaggersTALK  11:21, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Satish672, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!
 The Adventure

Welcome!
Hello, Satish672, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as SoET Vikram University Ujjain, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! 220  of  Borg 17:35, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Mehgaon
Please do not perform edits like this one that you did at Mehgaon. Putting a source in an edit summary only is not correct practice. (See WP:Verifiability) You could have used the existing reference 'template', but used the new URL and changed the dates and other data as needed for the new source. AFAIK there is no reason that the older demographic information cannot be kept and the new census data added, thus allowing comparison to be made by the reader. 220  of  Borg 18:24, 23 October 2015 (UTC)