User talk:Satore

Hi. I am satore, not store :-)

December 2014
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Jap, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. DAJF (talk) 10:01, 9 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Hello, DAJF.
 * Do you think you could be more specific?
 * You mean "Japanese don't know the word "Jap"" ?
 * thx, Satore (talk) 17:12, 10 December 2014 (UTC)


 * What I mean is that you will need to provide a reliable source that actually supports the claim that the word is "popularly known, used and referenced frequently in Internet". Just using a bloggy article that gives the opinion of one person is not appropriate. As mentioned in my original message above, please take the time to read through the relevant guidelines to save yorself problems in the future. Thanks. --DAJF (talk) 23:48, 11 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Did you really read the page? The "Rocket News" is not just a personal blog and you should read it even it is written in Japanese because the article is "Reaction in Japan". thx,Satore (talk) 19:47, 12 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Hi. Yes, I did read the page you used as a citation. Unfortunately, it does appear to be a personal opinion piece and does not actually support the claim you wrote, so not only is it not a reliable source, but it also contravenes the policy against original research on Wikipedia. I presume you read Japanese, so could you quote the part in the article that verifies that the word "Jap" is "referenced frequently on the Internet"? In the meantime, I've tagged the problem reference with a maintenance tag, which will give you a bit more time to look for a reliable source. Also, please note that marking controversial edits (such as reversions) as "minor" is a not considered good practice on Wikipedia. --DAJF (talk) 00:38, 13 December 2014 (UTC)