User talk:Saturne160

March 2014
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Cornish people, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 16:46, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary with every edit. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history.

The edit summary appears in:
 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list and
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 16:48, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Evan Spiegel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Episcopal church (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

October 2014
Hello, I'm Doniago. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person   on Donnie Wahlberg, but you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- DonIago (talk) 19:24, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

December 2014
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Cornish people, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 19:30, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Sorry, but the article "Cornish people" is in the category "Cornish people", which is already in the category "Celtic people". So why put the article into the both categories ?

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:
 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list and
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 23:26, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John D. Rockefeller, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scots-Irish. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Murder of Kriss Donald, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scots. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

April 2015
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Italians, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Alex2006 (talk) 08:48, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Julie Bresset
Would you please insert the ref to the article and only AFTER that add a category. Right now, it looks like original research. Thank you.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:27, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Btw the article does not mention that she is of Breton ethnicity. Pls find a source which mentions it.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:29, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Saturne160, please read WP:CAT/EGRS. Editors can not assign categories on attributes like ethnicity or sexual orientation without the identity assignment being mentioned in an article, ideally with a citation to reference material.
 * Please discuss this issue on the article talk page (Talk:Julie Bresset) or on Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents where the conflict is being discussed right now. Thank you. Liz  Read! Talk! 12:58, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

June 2015
Now, since you have chosen to revert rather than discuss, I have opened a topic about you, Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Please feel free to respond there.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:54, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 29
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Moken people, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sea Gypsies. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Karen Mok, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Iranian People. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

July 2017
Hello, I'm TheMagnificentist. I noticed that in this edit to Louis Mélennec, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. - The   Magnificentist  08:59, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Survey Invite
I'm working on a study of political motivations and how they affect editing. I'd like to ask you to take a survey. The survey should take 5 minutes. Your survey responses will be kept private. Our project is documented at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Wikipedia_%2B_Politics.

Survey Link: http://uchicago.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_80J3UDCpLnKyWTH?Q_DL=3dz0m2ubQw1KSnb_80J3UDCpLnKyWTH_MLRP_3NSmI4ah9FLXCu1&Q_CHL=gl

I am asking you to participate in this study because you are a frequent editor of pages on Wikipedia that are of political interest. We would like to learn about your experiences in dealing with editors of different political orientations.

Sincere thanks for your help! Porteclefs (talk) 19:46, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

Vandalism
So, you want white pride to say "encourage people to take pride in being white." and black pride say it's to "signal racist or racialist viewpoints" and your edit summary says "I'm sorry but we must write the same thing as on the other pride pages (black, asian...) or it will not be coherent. Wikipedia is a neutral place, and the white pride should not be shown as more negative than the others."? You have a strange idea of what "the same thing" means. And of Wikipedia. We aren't "neutral" in the sense you mean. Our articles should be built only on what reliable sources say, not our opinions or some odd effort to make things that are different but sound alike equivalent. Doug Weller talk 11:28, 15 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Replying here. You either haven't read {{WP:RS]] or don't agree with it. Until you get our policy and guidelines changed, you'll have to put up with them. We also don't attempt to be "ideologically neutral" as you suggest. I don't even understand what that would be - treat Fascism and anti-Fascism as though one wasn't better than the other? Doug Weller  talk 14:00, 15 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Do you really work for Wikipedia ? It's sad to see that you don't know what ideological neutrality means ! That means that you're not here to judge what is better, black pride or white pride, you just have to present it as it is really. If you have written that black pride is when blacks are proud to be black, then you must write the same thing for white pride. Unless you consider blacks and whites as humanly too different, you have to treat them equally. It is not even a question of ideology but human egality.


 * Of greater importance is the fact that you work for Wikipedia. By joining the project, you should want to be familiar with our policies on neutrality and reliable sources. In general white and black pride are detailed in different ways on Wikipedia because they are written about differently in the sources we have available, which include academic texts and the press. If you have an isssue with the way the press works or with what academia is writing about, you've come to the wrong place to change it. We only deal with what's been written about the world, not the way our editors think it should be. Here to help if you need a hand finding sources though. Edaham (talk) 09:34, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

January 2018
this edit demonstrates an intent to willfully disregard policies which you have been alerted to in the recent past. Please don't add your personal opinions to our articles. The next time you do I will make an wp:ANI report Edaham (talk) 18:50, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of oldest military units and formations in continuous operation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Airborne ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/List_of_oldest_military_units_and_formations_in_continuous_operation check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/List_of_oldest_military_units_and_formations_in_continuous_operation?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:21, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

May 2023
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Vinc Pichel, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you.  Cassiopeia  talk  02:42, 24 May 2023 (UTC)