User talk:Satyamehvichayateh

217.8.56.219 (talk) 12:19, 1 August 2014 (UTC)== July 2014 == Hello, I'm MastCell. Your recent edit to the page John Hagelin appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. MastCell Talk 17:40, 15 July 2014 (UTC) Hello, My name Peter Schwarz. I was reading the article about John Haegeling and his research on the "Maharishi Effect", which made me wonder how negative his work was judged in wikipedia. I am an electronic engineer and my main expertise consists in hardware development in the field of automotive electronics as well as solar- and windenergy. Solar- and windenergy has some historical relation to me, since I was one of the first who developed a new type of charge controllers, called Maximum Power Point Tracker. So this was 25 years ago and I am still producing these controllers. A quite more technical challenge is windpower tracking. Now, concerning the Maharishi effect, I have got some experience with it, since I took part in some of the so called "world peace assemblies". One was in Holland/Amsterdam around 1984, with about 5000 participants and one in Frankfurt 1983, with about 800 participants. To assemble such groups is quite much effort and it costs several millions for all together, to travel from all over the world, to one place and stay there for some days or even weeks. Nobody pays for the time spent, than oneself.

I noticed that Haegelins work on the "Maharishi effect" was not clearly cited in the wikipedia article. The theme of his work is: EFFECTS OF GROUP PRACTICE OF THE TRANSCENDENTAL MEDITATION PROGRAM ON PREVENTING VIOLENT CRIME IN WASHINGTON, D.C.: RESULTS OF THE NATIONAL DEMONSTRATION PROJECT, JUNE–JULY 1993 The citation of the "Maharishi effect" in wikipedia is only a TM Centers homepage, with a short summery of the "Maharishi effect". But critical citations of "Park" appear 3 times in the text. This is somehow not balanced and a reader misses a proper reference to the object of critics, which is obviously Haegelins research on it.

In the Wikipediatext is put the statement from Haegelin "the numbers of murders had increased .." This is wrong cited. I refer to the explanation in the attached text "A Rebuttal to “Voodoo Science” by Maxwell Rainforth, Ph.D.

Wikipedia claims that the review board is composed of entirely TM practitioneers. Is there any proof for this? There is no citation in the text, which could proof this claim. Haegelins work points out clearly: "A 27-member Project Review Board comprising independent scientists and leading citizens approved the research protocol and monitored the research process". Is he a liar? He is a well established scientist.

Concerning the critics of Park, it seems to be very emotional and nonscientific. He even is insulting Haegelin and his research group. And it seems that he even did not study the theme at all. I refer to "A Rebuttal to “Voodoo Science” by Maxwell Rainforth, Ph.D.

After all I would appreciate if the above mentioned points would be corrected in the text. As I already had done it.

With kind regards Dipl. Ing. (FH) Peter Schwarz 217.8.56.219 (talk) 12:25, 1 August 2014 (UTC)