User talk:SatyrTN/Archive 2

Infobox city
I think that it is now ready to go live, but it should probably be un-HTML coded. - 52 Pickup 18:01, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Really? Does the html strain the server more?  Or is there another reason? –  SatyrTN (talk | contribs)  18:38, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

I DONT KNO WAT THIS IS !!!!!!!!!!! BUT I KNO SOMEONE BETTER BE OPEN WITH ME ;) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.150.73.104 (talk • contribs) 07:12, 2007 February 2 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thanks for the welcome to the LGBT project, Satyr! --Aleta 04:51, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the invite!, Cleara --Allyn

Peter Paddleford
Thanks for your interest.

"Capt." Philip Paddleford was born in Enfield. He married in Enfield Ruth Bullock in 1778. He had no children when he moved to Lyman (now Monroe) in 1779. At the time of the 1790 census, he had five children, one of which was Peter born 1785, presumably (what can I do here?) born in Lyman/Monroe. Peter was the fifth child, so I don't see Ruth going back to Enfield to bear him. Not easy traveling in those days.

The 1790 census agrees with my count except there is one more adult male that I can't match up. A helper? A relative living with them? I don't know. But the kids match. So, most likely he was born in Monroe/Lyman. I think he lived in Littleton. He's buried there. So he looked north (as did most of Monroe), not south. Better roads? Closer? I don't know.

So can I prove that he wasn't born in Enfield? No. But I don't think he was.

Refreshing to be editing in New Hampshire and actually have some interest in my small contributions! Student7 12:55, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thanks for the welcome to the LGBT project, Satyr! GLGerman 15:50, 4 January 2007 (UTC) I will write sometimes here and help, but more i´m on german wikipedia because i´m a native german language speaker.GLGerman 15:50, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

Portal
No-one seems terribly interested in the Portal, so I figured whoever signed up to do it could choose whatever they wanted within reason. The articles don't have to be featured, just fairly good quality. I'd choose a mix of FAs and GAs if I were you until you run out, and then just use your own judgement, really.

Btw, does anyone you know at the WikiProject actually write articles? Cos a lot of them seem to Wikignome and not a lot else. Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 18:21, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

ISBNs
Well, Wikipedia has not been updated to use longer ISBNs. The whole point of using them is to be able to click through and use them to find the books. Also, you can not rely on Amazon for ISBNs - they will assign their own numbers to books w/o any ISBN. Those are not supposed to be used. A Ramachandran 15:36, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Ah, I see that you were using the ISBN from the Kessinger reprint of Cabellian Harmonics - that is not the edition documented. The edition documented is the Random House first edition. Please be careful when using ISBNs to use the ISBN for the correct edition. Match the publisher and date. If you want to document a reprint, it requires another citation, though I think the cite template may have a method for documenting two editions in the same cite.


 * For now, we should be using 10 digit ISBNs. Try clicking through the link of a 13 digit and then click through to Amazon - it doesn't work. A Ramachandran 15:45, 6 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Hunh. Even though it's the new standard and Wikipedia processes the ISBN 13s correctly, it looks like very few other sites have updated their systems.  Though the "Worldcat" link (the third one) did work correctly.  Thanks for pointing it out - I shouldn't assume that websites will be up to date on their standards :)
 * I'll look into how the template handles reprints and multiple editions. – SatyrTN (talk | contribs)  15:55, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

List of gay porn stars
Per another comment, I've changed the desired article name to List of male performers in gay porn films; substituting "porn" for "pornographic". This is just an FYI; you might want to revisit the Requested move section and update your earlier comment. Thanks. &mdash; Chidom   talk   06:07, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Re: LGBT studiess, etc
I was so happy to randomly run across this group. I've been looking for something like it ever since I first started seriously contributing to Wikipedia. When was it "founded"? If you look here and scroll down you'll see I've already created some gay-themed articles. You may want to add the appropriate ones to the project, or I can after I learn more about how things are dome specific to this project. Thanks! -FateSmiled&amp;DestinyLaughed 03:07, 9 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Hi, Brian (or Fate :) )! WP:LGBT was started back in April '06, but it didn't gather much steam until around August/September.  With only ~40 members, it's still fledgling, but we're working on it!  Welcome to the project - and *please* add and edit as you will!  We seem to have quite a few WikiFaeries and are sorely lacking editors :)  Feel free to hit me back with any questions - though we seem to be a fairly friendly (happy and gay) bunch, so you can also ask on the project talk page.  TTYL! –  SatyrTN (talk | contribs)  03:16, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Portal Biography
I know you're listed as the maintainer of the LGBT Portal bio section, but when I saw that bitch Angelina Jolie on the page I just blew a gasket and changed it to Camille Paglia. Please feel free to change it to something else...anything is better than the bitch who stole Brad Pitt from our Bestest Friend! Jeffpw 20:13, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
 * WHAT?! Aniston's the bitch! She's the one who refused point blank to have children with Brad - my GOD, if Brad Pitt came up to you and said "Have babies with me" wouldn't you say yes?(obviously, if it were biologically possible) What was she thinking? How could she?! Bitch!! All Angelina did was pick up a broken-hearted Brad and give him Shiloh, and good on her. Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 21:29, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
 * OMG, y'all! Settle down!  I could care less about Jennifer, Angelina, or even Brad! Though he is sometimes hot :)  I only picked Angelina because a) we'd only had men on the portal until then, and b) I recognized her name as someone people would know - I myself only know what I've read in her article :)  But Camille's fine, too :)  Next month I'm going to put up a Tranny.  Any objections? –  SatyrTN (talk | contribs)  00:44, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh, Satyr! I didn't realize you had added the Evil Bitch yourself. I checked in the history, and it looked as if she had been squatting in that space for a month now (how typical of her). Had I known you had selected her, I never would have changed it, no matter how deep my contempt for that home wrecking hussy runs. Jeffpw 10:30, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Okay - I know it's really early in the morning and I'm punchy because I haven't had my coffee, but that just made me laugh :) A great use of the "saying I'm sorry and throwing a punch on the side" :) !!!  Thanks, Jeff :) –  SatyrTN (talk | contribs)  13:16, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Historical
If you say so. To me, "notable inhabitants" implies that the people are inhabiting the place as we speak, but maybe I'm wrong. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mjl0509 (talk • contribs) 18:30, 12 January 2007 (UTC).

Sexuality and gender identity-based cultures
Hi Satyr, I'd be glad to help with the article, but unfortunately I'm busy just about 24/7 with my real job at this time. The article does need a good bit of work. Maybe a little later we can work on it together, ok? Take care. --Textorus 00:07, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

Same-sex marriage in the United States‎
Okay - WOW! That was some work you did on the template! Thanks a ton!

PS: Have you considered joining WP:LGBT?

PPS: Where in TN?

-- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 07:08, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks – it's nice of you to say so :) Jersyko and I wrote all but 3 of those little articles as well as List of defense of marriage amendments by type and most of Defense of marriage amendment. As far as WP:LGBT goes, thanks for the offer but I'm not sure I can join it at this time. I have a lot of different things on wikipedia going on right now and I'm afraid of over-committing myself. (I'm active on FR as well and about to start spending more or my wikitime there and a little less here). But WP:LGBT looks like a great project and I wish you the best of luck there, and I'd hardly rule out doing something there from time to time. (By the way, while I'm a great believer in NPOV, I'm also a great believer in gay rights). I'm in west Tennessee; what about you? -- Zantastik  talk  07:32, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
 * So that was a lot of work! Good job!  Part of the reason I asked about WP:LGBT is because one of the sub-groups is a translation group, and they'd love to have your input.  If you get time and energy (and I understand about over-reaching :), feel free to sign up or just drop by and see what's going on.  I'm currently in Memphis, but only for tonight.  I've lived (and will be returning to) the Nashville area.  Anyway, thanks again! –  SatyrTN (talk | contribs)  08:04, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

Gay icon up for Afd now
Please see the discussion (you can get there via the ugly tag that has been slapped on the front of it. 6 hours work, possibly for nothing. I am massively pissed off. Jeffpw 15:30, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

LG history
Sure, no problem. I'll make it a point to visit regularly that page to check changes and keep it clean. :) Cheers Raystorm 18:18, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Finally one we agree on!
FABOO choice for the bio this week! I love Candy Darling!!! Woo Hoo!!! Jeffpw 18:01, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Finally!?!? I've put two bios up and you stomped in and changed my first one!  I think this heading should be renamed "Finally I'll let you do your job"! :) :) :)  Glad you like it - though she's only a B article, I figured it was worth putting her up there. –  SatyrTN (talk | contribs)  18:33, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I seriously thought that bitch err, Angelina Holie err, Jolie had been cluttering up the Portal for months. Guess it only felt like that. :P Anyway, Candy Darling is, well, darling!

As to her being only a "B", if you look at the articles I have chosen, they are both "B"s as well. The guideline says GA or FA, or being of significant interest or importance, so I think we are both choosing well....now. :-) Jeffpw 18:52, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Evesdroppin?
Of course not!; I appricate it it VERY much that you talked to me, in all honesty; I welcome any comment, from any origin! Thanks! Thanks for the project insights; I'll sign up & see what I can do. Thanks!100110100 03:45, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better – thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. – SuggestBot 15:45, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

Aaron Copland
hey thanks! all i have to do now is gather the information on his lover, Leo Smit. --emerson7 | Talk 06:03, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Help, please
All right, I admit I am a computer doofus! If you look at the articles, and then the archives, you'll see I (a) named the archives wrong, and (b) maybe made a new page when there were already archived articles in existence. I did ask Dev about this a couple weeks ago, but she said that I had to create them myself. I can't find any archives for selected articles, but there are archives going back months for the bios. Can you maybe help a tired old queen out when she's down on her luck????? Jeffpw 16:42, 25 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the tip! You're a prince among men. I'll make the archives myself, now that I figured out how to find the history of the page. But why weren't the archived in the first place??? Very unwiki of whoever did it. Jeffpw 20:24, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Categories/
Hey, guess what? Turns out there's a special html code to create category trees:

Hope you like. Let me know if you still need a manual list for your bot. Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 23:09, 26 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Hunh. Who knew!  Thanks - I can build the manual list from that :) –  SatyrTN (talk | contribs)  23:22, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Okay - so by my count, 386 current categories in the tree. – SatyrTN (talk | contribs)  23:50, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Have you taken out duplicates? I've discovered, rather irritatingly, that parent categories can be found in lower categories elsewhere. Bisexual writers in the United States being a good example Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 23:57, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Yep - that's with duplicates removed. But guess what?  AIDS isn't mentioned anywhere in here.  It probably should be, don't you think? –  SatyrTN (talk | contribs)  01:07, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm too young to remember it as the gay plague - now it seems like the African plague. I'm probably therefore not the best person to ask. :) Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 07:54, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Ah, to be young! I'm not too young to remember, and AIDS should definitely be included in one category or other. It changed the way the LGBT community looked at itself, its relationships with each other as members of an oppressed class, and was instrumental in our emergence as a political movement. Jeffpw 08:48, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Help, please
All right, I admit I am a computer doofus! If you look at the articles, and then the archives, you'll see I (a) named the archives wrong, and (b) maybe made a new page when there were already archived articles in existence. I did ask Dev about this a couple weeks ago, but she said that I had to create them myself. I can't find any archives for selected articles, but there are archives going back months for the bios. Can you maybe help a tired old queen out when she's down on her luck????? Jeffpw 16:42, 25 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the tip! You're a prince among men. I'll make the archives myself, now that I figured out how to find the history of the page. But why weren't the archived in the first place??? Very unwiki of whoever did it. Jeffpw 20:24, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Categories/
Hey, guess what? Turns out there's a special html code to create category trees:

Hope you like. Let me know if you still need a manual list for your bot. Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 23:09, 26 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Hunh. Who knew!  Thanks - I can build the manual list from that :) –  SatyrTN (talk | contribs)  23:22, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Okay - so by my count, 386 current categories in the tree. – SatyrTN (talk | contribs)  23:50, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Have you taken out duplicates? I've discovered, rather irritatingly, that parent categories can be found in lower categories elsewhere. Bisexual writers in the United States being a good example Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 23:57, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Yep - that's with duplicates removed. But guess what?  AIDS isn't mentioned anywhere in here.  It probably should be, don't you think? –  SatyrTN (talk | contribs)  01:07, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm too young to remember it as the gay plague - now it seems like the African plague. I'm probably therefore not the best person to ask. :) Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 07:54, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Ah, to be young! I'm not too young to remember, and AIDS should definitely be included in one category or other. It changed the way the LGBT community looked at itself, its relationships with each other as members of an oppressed class, and was instrumental in our emergence as a political movement. Jeffpw 08:48, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

AWB
If you have the user preferences set to add pages to your watch list, then it will add them to the account you are signed into AWB with. So far as I know, you can't set it to add to another person's watchlist. Do you need it for anything in particular? Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 23:36, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Nope - don't need it. I've coded a bot in PHP that I'm using very occasionally - like I just used it to LGBTProject / stub the set of pages in Category:LGBT civil rights timeline.  For some reason, it watchlisted them under this account, though.  I'll have to check my code and see what I've done :)  It's not the preferences, though, since I use the same account to tag tons of other pages, which have never shown up.  &lt;sigh&gt;  Then again, these are the silly problems I love to spend time figuring out :) –  SatyrTN (talk | contribs)  01:05, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, that is weird. I guess I've never considered that might happen because I'm logged in as DevAlt on IE, but Dev920 on Mozilla Firefox, so I can use both simultaneously but they're kept apart. Is anyone taggng pages besides you and me? :) Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 12:07, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

JumpAclass
Anne Fleming (writer). It may not look like it, but this was the product of 2 hours work. :-( Jeffpw 14:49, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I'll play! (if that's OK). My stub is Declaration of Montreal. Should be list our cjoice on the Jumpaclass page? WJBscribe 15:07, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm going with Morris Kight. Yes, we should list them on the JaC page.  And Jeff, you've got a week, so don't fret! :) –  SatyrTN (talk | contribs)  15:12, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, ok, apparently I have jumped further than you so far, so I am satisfied. :-) And not fret? Moi? Fret is my middle name. I heard that the DSM-V is going to include a fretting disorder in my honor. I even fret in my userboxes (see if you can find my fret box, which I made myself). Jeffpw 15:25, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Open task template?
Heya, any progress on the open task template/cleanup category/bot thing? Anything I can help with? Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 18:06, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

Actually, yeh - I'm making some good progress :) Would you mind going through Category:Cleanup templates - or maybe Template messages/Cleanup and let me know which ones we should actually keep track of?  I mean, for testing I'm looking for "Template:Wikify" and "Template:Expand", but I know there are others. –  SatyrTN (talk | contribs)  19:31, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The way I envisioned it is we have several broad categories "LGBT articles needing Expert Attention/Wikification/NPOV/Verification/Translation", with a "LGBT articles needing cleanup" for anything that doesn't fall under those scopes. You said you've been testing Expand, so I guess we ought to have an Expansion category as well. I can go through Template messages/Cleanup and list the templates into the catgories for you if you would like? Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 20:56, 21 January 2007 (UTC)


 * If you don't mind? The sheer number of templates listed intimidates me :) Just point out the main ones - which you've sorta done already - Expert, Wiki, NPOV, etc - and if the rest of the templates on the page are "misc cleanup", that's kewl. –  SatyrTN (talk | contribs)  21:00, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Sure:


 * Cleanup
 * cleanup
 * cleanup-remainder
 * cleanup-confusing
 * cleanup-list
 * create-list
 * cleanup-disambig
 * cleanup-afd
 * abbreviations
 * buzzword
 * cleanup-combine
 * cleanup-laundry
 * cleanup-laundryrack
 * cleanup-rewrite
 * cleanup-spam
 * in-universe
 * contradict
 * Essay-entry
 * fiction
 * Prose
 * External links
 * toomuchtrivia
 * uncategorized
 * spelling


 * Expert Attention
 * Expert
 * Expert-verify
 * in-universe


 * Wikification
 * cleanup-restructure
 * proseline
 * in-universe
 * wikify


 * NPOV
 * advert
 * review
 * fansite
 * review
 * POV
 * POV-section
 * totally-disputed
 * totally-disputed-section
 * sections
 * globalize
 * story
 * weasel


 * Verification
 * copypaste
 * Disputed
 * Disputed-section
 * citations missing
 * citecheck
 * unreferenced
 * Unreferencedsect
 * originalresearch


 * Expand
 * context
 * Expand
 * Expand-section
 * local
 * Expand


 * Translation
 * Notenglish
 * TranslatePassage
 * cleanup-translation
 * RoughTranslation

These are the main templates, there are others on the page but no-one so far as I know actually uses them. I put copyvio issues into Verification because I think they go together. I haven't done anything with merges or moves. This look OK? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Dev920 (talk • contribs) 21:37, 21 January 2007 (UTC).
 * Awesome!!! Thanks! –  SatyrTN (talk | contribs)  23:32, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

Hi. =) I suggest that when performing deletion sorting, SatyrTNbot should also check for articles within nearby projects' scopes, by watching for WP Sexuality and WikiProject Gender Studies. — coe l acan t a lk  — 13:02, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
 * So I thought Deletion sorting happened automatically - that there was a bot that sorted AfDs into subgroups. That's not the case, though, is it? –  SatyrTN (talk | contribs)  16:02, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Right, it's not automatic. Or if there are some deletion sorting bots, they are only assigned to certain boards, so I haven't seen them. From time to time, I use WikiProject Deletion sorting/Islam (which is surprisingly empty at the moment for the first time in months), and I never see bots using it. All the deletions are added by Truthspreader, Itaqallah, and Bsnowball, who are regular editors. So for WikiProject Deletion sorting/Sexuality and gender, SatyrTNbot can watch for those wikiproject templates, as well as for LGBTProject, on the talk pages of any article that's in AFD, and add Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName to WikiProject Deletion sorting/Sexuality and gender. Remember that wikiproject templates may have an arbitrary number of arguments, all of which the bot will need to ignore. — coe l acan t a lk  — 01:51, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Whew! Okay - got a little work cut out for me, then – luckily I not only do this for a living, I like doing this :) --- SatyrTN (talk | contribs)  05:30, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Double yikes! I don't think that bot can have all the space between those comments. It needs to allow people to edit that space. There will be some articles and whatnot that are too new to have a wikiproject template tag, that will be added manually from time to time. Also adding the "Images and media" section is a good idea, but it needs to keep deletion review, as well as the categories, templates, and miscellany (which can be separate or in one section, not a big deal either way), and all the instruction comments for the different sections. Since that page is technically live right now and could need usage at any time, it might be best for you to set up a userspace sandbox mirror of it for the bot to scratch around in. — coe l acan t a lk  — 03:36, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Also, feel free to restrict the bot to just AFD's for the time being, if you want to keep it simple. Those are the ones that happen most often. Or go all the way, no problem either way. But most images are not tagged with wikiproject templates, AFAIK. Although that could be slowly changed. — coe l acan t a lk  — 03:38, 25 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your help Coelacan! My plan is to add some text to that page to explain what the bot is doing and how users can add new listings to that page.  They can add to any of the sections just like they do now (and I need to add back in those comments about how to add articles, cats, etc).  When the bot is run again (and I was thinking every week), anything they've added will be deleted - though I'm planning on making sure anything added to the list gets a project tag, so it will stay on the list.
 * Question, though, about the sections - what's the "deletion review" section you mentioned? All the others are still there and will still be there when the bot gets through.
 * As for testing, I did run it on a sandbox to test things out. And I figured it was pretty okay to move to the real space, since there currently aren't any articles, cats, whatever up for deletion.
 * Thanks again, – SatyrTN (talk | contribs)  03:49, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Deletion review is the last refuge of the damned. WP:DRV — coe l acan t a lk  — 04:01, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The bot's probably going to have to run every day. Two or three times a day would even be good. When an AFD comes up, it's important to start replying quickly. And AFD's only last for five days tops, so once a week couldn't cut it. How about if the bot never deletes anything from that page, and we leave that for humans to take care of? Ideally, the bot would recognize the format of an entry in the list, and ignore those. Or, actually, this might be better (I'm giving you stream of consciousness now), maybe each section has just one comment line in it, like and  and so on. The bot would look for the appropriate comment tag, (also, ducks) create one newline immediately following the tag, and add its output there in that single line. Then stop. Repeat if necessary. This way, it would always add new stuff at the top of each section, and it wouldn't have to worry about keeping things inside two barriers. Again, human removal when the discussions close. And btw, the layout of WP:DRV is pretty complicated. Don't worry about parsing that right now. The nature of DRV is such that humans are always aware of what's there, because nothing goes there until it recently completed an XFD, and people tend to follow it over there. — coe l acan  t a lk  — 04:15, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
 * If someone removes the bot's comment tags, probably best to let humans replace them. Dev and I will definitely be paying close attention to that page, and we can put them back in whenever that's necessary. For safe redundancy, the bot could spit a request on one of its user subpage if it runs into problems, and we can watchlist that subpage. — coe l acan t a lk  — 04:18, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
 * That works for me. Though running that every day?!? Hmm - I think I'm going to have to tweak my code some.  It currently takes about 15 minutes to run. K - I'm going to revert to the previous version until I get the new code worked out.  Thanks again for your help!!! --/ SatyrTN (talk | contribs)  04:21, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Is the find_comment-add_newline-add_output-save_page idea a feasible one? — coe l acan t a lk  — 05:03, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Definitely. My only concern with that process is that, my way, I (the bot) just put all the ones I find on the list.  This way, I should check to see if the ones I find are on the list already, and that means parsing something a human put on the page.  Which is not always correct.  But since you're pretty sure humans will be around to fix mistakes, that's kewl.  And I prefer loons. ;)  –  SatyrTN (talk | contribs)  05:29, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

If the humans follow the instructions provided on that page, there should always be a link from the deletion sorting page directly to the article/category/whatever being deleted. I'm talking in html a_href tags now; in wiki markup we should expect one of three forms, or colon-prefixed Namespace:Pagename or if they made a very common mistake non-colon-prefixed Namespace:Pagename ... those should be all we expect. But I would consider just grabbing the html of the deletion sorting page, because it should always have a regular html link to the page under XFD, and you don't have to worry about the various permutations of human weirdness; MediaWiki will first filter that for you instead. If that uglies up the code too much, just rely on humans to clean up redundancies. It's better to get two links rather than zero. — coe l acan t a lk  — 07:05, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Curiosity on my part. Did SatyrBot already go through WP:RFBA yet or are you still testing it? — coe l acan t a lk  — 06:00, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * He's been through it and has his bot flag. But I'll probably have to go through it again - at the time a) I was using Pywikipedia and now I've written some stuff in PHP; and b) I am currently only using him in oversight mode, but I'd like to automate a couple processes. –  SatyrTN (talk | contribs)  15:05, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Righto. I don't know how I missed it. But anyway, good job on the bot. =) — coe l acan t a lk  — 03:03, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Help re:template
Hi Satyr, I think I'm in need of your technical expertise. I've become aware of a slight problem with the LGBT project tag for talk pages. Most talkpage tags (including project ones) have a parametre to turn it into a small version on the right side of the page. Which helps when talk pages have vast numbers of tags. This should be activated by using: but our template doesn't have a smaller version. I haven't been able to figure out how to adapt the template myself. Any chance you known how to do this? Would be much appreciated... WJBscribe 14:02, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Yep. I just replied on the LGBT talk page - that functionality is there already. Take a look at Alan Turing's talk page for an example. –  SatyrTN (talk | contribs)  14:05, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
 * So you did :-). Sorry about that. Total mental abbheration on my part... WJBscribe 14:07, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Not a problem - real-time doesn't happen all that often on here :) – SatyrTN (talk | contribs)  14:17, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Maybe a more sensible question re:template. Might it be possible to have a "reason =" field in the template so we can explain why we're tagging an article if this might be disputed. e.g. a politician who is very opposed to gay rights. It would enable us to have in the tag "although this person is not themselves homosexual, the project takes interest in them because of the vast impact their policies have on the rights of LGBT people". Would that be relatively simple and do you think its a good idea? WJBscribe 14:01, 29 January 2007 (UTC)


 * You know, I like the way youthink! Actually, just this morning I was thinking "How come Anita Bryant gets tagged but George Bush doesn't? (though I've just noticed WPBaseball has him tagged for some odd reason).  In any case, I like your idea.  How about I use the variable "explanation", which will be optional? –  SatyrTN (talk | contribs)  14:31, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Yeah, explanation seems a good option. We may still want to hold off tagging George Bush and the Pope though if we don't want to start WikiCivilWar :). WJBscribe 15:03, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
 * ROTFL! I have no intention of tagging either one :)  I'll work on the template today.  Glad we both thought of it! –  SatyrTN (talk | contribs)  15:07, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

George Bush is tagged by WP:BASEBALL, I would imagine, is because he used to own a baseball team before running for Governor of Texas. I think we should only tag people who are active anti-gay campaigners, rather than people who oppose gay rights as a sideline. It seems teh best way to go about it. Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 16:24, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
 * So how does this look to y'all? – SatyrTN (talk | contribs)  16:29, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I've put this into production. If anyone actually uses the explanation tag someplace, maybe they could add a "See Talk:Someplace as an example" to the instructions? –  SatyrTN (talk | contribs)  19:18, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Cool with me. We'll need to develop a guideline for who to include though. Also, if we're adding optional parameters, can we add a list category? I think once we finally finish work on List of GLB people and raise it to FL status, the rest will be easy. But of course, we need a list of lists first. Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 16:58, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Sure, but do we need it? Category:Non-article_LGBT_pages is almost all Lists or Templates.  But I can add it if you want.  You mean a "class=List", right?
 * As for who to include, I was thinking we'd just leave that open. If someone questions us placing the tag, we can put in the explanation, otherwise no need. –  SatyrTN (talk | contribs)  17:33, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I just really want a list category. *bats eyelashes* Please? Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 20:48, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Done! Enjoy! :) –  SatyrTN (talk | contribs)  21:51, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Thank you!!!!
Awesome! My first barnstars!!! Thanks :) Wait - the graphic designer's one looks almost like the LGBT one... Who's idea was that!? :) –  SatyrTN (talk | contribs)  02:14, 29 January 2007 (UTC)


 * No idea, but I noticed it too. Doubly sweet haha! Cheers Raystorm 12:35, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Keene, New Hampshire
Whoops, thanks for the save there. Just H 03:43, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Not a problem - glad to help :) – SatyrTN (talk | contribs)  05:14, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Infoboxes
Hi there. I've finally gotten around to starting up WikiProject Infoboxes. The project page itself is still pretty bare, but at least we now have a central discussion point for this sort of work. Please join! - 52 Pickup 13:56, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

commons:User:SatyrTN
I assert to be the same user as commons:User:SatyrTN SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 01:39, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Adam4Adam
I saw your comments on HoS's talk page. An admin deleted his Adam4Adam article after another admin restored it and did so despite a "hangon" and despite references that included the New York Times. HoS is really fed up with Wikipedia right now and has (in his words) marched off to "sulk like Achillies in his tent!" I don't blame him. It wouldn't hurt if you might lodge an opinion about the Adam4Adam article on its Deletion Review. I hope suggesting that isn't breaking Wiki-protocol! If it is, please don't fink on me. I am already in trouble for referring to the admininstrator as...um...let's say "a vulgar term for the exit terminus of the digestive system". Shaundakulbara 01:51, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Fink on you!?!? Never!  That would be following the rules - Faeries don't follow rules :)  I'll take a look at the deletion review, but I've never participated in one, and don't know much about the article, so I don't know how much help I'll be.  But I'll take a look! –  SatyrTN (talk | contribs)  02:14, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Here's a link to the Adam4Adam Review in case you get lost. I usually do as so as I leave mt beaten Wiki-path. Shaundakulbara 04:08, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Re: Tagging LGBT articles
I'll take your advice onboard, though I'm no good at rating articles. I'm just confused as to why the film Brokeback Mountain isn't part of the project, or has there been some argument on the page? LuciferMorgan 02:31, 1 February 2007 (UTC)


 * I, for 1, am going through LGBT articles category by category. Of course, in this case, Brokeback doesn't seem to be in any of the LGBT related categories, so I'd never get to it. &lt;sigh&gt; I've gone ahead and tagged it.
 * Btw, I classify the articles roughly, figuring editors of each article will change the rating if needed. I classify by looking at the length, the number of sections, whether there are cleanup tags, even whether or not there's discussion on the talk page.  There's a full discussion on the WP:LGBT/Assessment page, but you can probably just go with your instinct :) – SatyrTN (talk | contribs)  02:43, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

POTY 2006 voting
Thank you for your participation in the POTY 2006 election. But you forgot to sign your vote! - Alvesgaspar 12:08, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Doh! Thanks :)

Rock Against Sexism
What's gay about ? Also, sorry for not replying about your signature suggestion. Tbh, I don't think we should be doing anything that encourages prettifying of anything, let alone signatures - thar be the path to eight line sigs with bright flashing lights and images the size of Borneo! Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 20:35, 1 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Oooh! Flashing lights!!!  Okay - it was a silly idea - I admit it :)
 * As for RAS, the article twice mentions gay content - RAS Boston held many of their rallies at gay bars in town, and under the "Legacy" section, the article states that RAS led to "an increased awareness of women's and queer perspectives in the punk rock community. Many trace the riot grrl movement in the 1990's to RAS roots. It challenged heterosexism, homophobia, sexism and elitism, while challenging stereotypes of women, and the way they are represented." I think that pretty well covers the tag - but I'm open to your thoughts! –  SatyrTN (talk | contribs)  20:41, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Darn it, I forgot you reply on your own page. OK, that seems fair then, now you put it like that. Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 22:19, 1 February 2007 (UTC)