User talk:Satyricon2

Disambiguation link notification for May 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gay Meets Girl, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Compartmentalization. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:11, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (List of people who identity as sexually fluid) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating List of people who identity as sexually fluid, Satyricon2!

Wikipedia editor Nick Moyes just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Care needs to be taken that no living person is added to this list without proper citation. See WP:BLP"

To reply, leave a comment on Nick Moyes's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Nick Moyes (talk) 23:06, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Gay Meets Girl hetero-deflowering 1.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Gay Meets Girl hetero-deflowering 1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:18, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Gold star gay for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gold star gay is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Gold star gay until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Sandstein  18:26, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

Bonus hole listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bonus hole. Since you had some involvement with the Bonus hole redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 09:13, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

WP:Primary sources
Hi, Satyricon2. Regarding this and this, you should generally refrain from adding WP:Primary sourced data. For why, see what WP:Primary sources state, and what I stated here and here. That is why I reverted you on those two edits. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 09:51, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

And to be clear, I mean that, per WP:PSTS, secondary sources and tertiary sources are preferred. Also, there is already a main article for the content you added. Although that article's primary sources need to be replaced with secondary sources or tertiary sources (which I will get around to doing), the detail you added to the Homosexuality article is better suited for that article instead. Again, your content should be supported by a secondary source or a tertiary source, however. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 10:05, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

WP:Reliable sources, WP:Notability, and WP:Due weight
In addition to what I stated to you above about WP:Primary sources, you also need to make sure that your sources are WP:Reliable. Do read WP:Reliable. And read WP:Primary sources if you have not already. Not every website meets the WP:Reliable sources guideline. For example, here I wonder why you think hornet.com is good source to use. The WhyNotBi.com article you created is currently supported by poor sources. You need to demonstrate WP:Notability for that article for it to continue to exist. Otherwise, it will be deleted. And per WP:Due weight, you should not be adding as much trans man material as you have to the Transsexual pornography article. Trans woman pornography is significantly more popular; so that is one reason that having more trans man than trans woman material in that article is undue weight. The other reason is your addition of non-notable names or incidents. That content should be trimmed. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 06:50, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Okay. I will review those guidelines. If the trans-male content is "Undue weight", then perhaps the article should be split into two, one for Transsexual female pornography and one for Transsexual male pornography. Both are established categories in porn that could likely support an independent article. If the WhyNotBi article is deleted, the remaining content should at least be merged into the article for MindGeek. Satyricon2 (talk) 07:01, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Given that you are not yet well-versed on the rules, I don't think you should create those articles. See WP:Spinout, WP:No page and WP:No split. We typically don't split out content unless necessary. And creating separate articles won't solve the issue of you using poor sources and including information on non-notable people or non-notable incidents. And as for merging, poorly sourced material should not be merged into another article. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 08:03, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
 * I didn't say that I was going to create those articles. You sound hostile. I'll probably choose to disengage from editing these articles from here out. Satyricon2 (talk) 08:15, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
 * I don't see how I sound hostile. All I did was note that it's not a good idea for you to create those articles and why, and also that merging wouldn't help solve the issues with the WhyNotBi article you created. Considering that you don't shy away from creating articles and you made the suggestions, of course I was going to assume that you were suggesting that you create those articles. If you were suggesting that I or someone else create them, that wasn't clear. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 10:06, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

Personal attacks
This constitutes multiple personal attacks and casting aspersions. Putting it in question form doesn't change that. You should retract it, really. But if you do it again, you will be taken to ANI. -Crossroads- (talk) 05:14, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Noted. Satyricon2 (talk) 05:16, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

Category:Sexual fluidity has been nominated for discussion
Category:Sexual fluidity, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 22:38, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

Category:Bisexual female media has been nominated for merging
Category:Bisexual female media, which you created, has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 21:47, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

"Heterosexual virginity" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Heterosexual virginity. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 11 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm Bacon 05:18, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

"Straight virginity" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Straight virginity. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 11 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm Bacon 05:19, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Cock (play).jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Cock (play).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:10, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Category:Documentary films about men has been nominated for merging
Category:Documentary films about men has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 15:31, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

Category:Female bisexuality in film has been nominated for renaming
Category:Female bisexuality in film has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 21:57, 3 February 2024 (UTC)