User talk:Saudahmed66

January 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Saudahmed66@hotmail.com, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests, and consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 16:00, 26 January 2010 (UTC) You should wait for others to write an article about subjects in which you are personally involved. This applies to articles about you, your achievements, your band, your business, your publications, your website, your relatives, and any other possible conflict of interest.

Creating an article about yourself is strongly discouraged. If you create such an article, it might be listed on articles for deletion. Deletion is not certain, but many feel strongly that you should not start articles about yourself. This is because independent creation encourages independent validation of both significance and verifiability. All edits to articles must conform to No original research, Neutral point of view, and Verifiability.

If you are not "notable" under Wikipedia guidelines, creating an article about yourself may violate the policy that Wikipedia is not a personal webspace provider and would thus qualify for speedy deletion. If your achievements, etc., are verifiable and genuinely notable, and thus suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. (See Wikipedians with articles.)  Ian.thomson (talk) 16:00, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Last warning
Please STOP creating new pages until you understand what sort of pages are allowed here. If you continue to create pages about non-notable shops and websites, you WILL be blocked. I've cleared all the old warnings away to make sure you see this. Ged UK  09:43, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px]] This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you use Wikipedia for advertising, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Mltinus (talk) 07:07, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Kcspart.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Kcspart.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 09:45, 8 July 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 09:45, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Mortein lrg.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Mortein lrg.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Eeekster (talk) 09:45, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Wapda.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Wapda.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Eeekster (talk) 09:47, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Fb-logo.png
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Fb-logo.png, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Eeekster (talk) 09:47, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 12:06, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Karachi Cambridge School
Hi. Thank you for your contributions to this article. I noticed that you appear to be unfamiliar with how to format Wikipedia articles, so I have fixed up the formatting of your additions for you. For example, sections are formatted like this: " ==Activities== ", and there is no need to manually draw section lines yourself. Also, it is best not to overload short articles with too many illustrations - for a school, just one or two is all that is really needed. I suggest you have a read through the Wikipedia Manual of Style, and have a look around other articles to get a feel for how they're formatted. Good luck with your future editing. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:20, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

File:Wapda.jpg missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Wapda.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 15:27, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

File:Kcspart.jpg missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Kcspart.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 15:27, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Ithmaar bank logo.png
Thank you for uploading File:Ithmaar bank logo.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:24, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Header-th.gif
Thank you for uploading File:Header-th.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:26, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

Image Notifcations
Your forgot to indicate what sort of 'license' the logos you uploaded were under.

Wikipedia takes copyright issues seriously, and so image need copyright and sourcing information Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:08, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Karachicambridge.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Karachicambridge.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 07:05, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

File:Iesco.gif
Please do not upload images you have found elsewhere on the Internet as your own work- not only is it potentially illegal, but it is completely contrary to Wikipedia policy. You have been warned a lot about image uploads already. Please be more careful, or you will find yourself blocked from editing. J Milburn (talk) 10:25, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

now you tell how can I upload images.--Saudahmed66 (talk) 18:21, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Last warning
I've just been through your uploads- that was ridiculous. I have deleted a high number of the images, and cleaned up the remainder, removing your claims of being the copyright holder. Consider this your last warning- if you continue to upload the work of others, claiming it as your own, you will be blocked from editing. J Milburn (talk) 10:53, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Saeed Ghani


The article Saeed Ghani has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Only source is company's own website, there is nothing to establish the notability of this company within WP:CORP.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rodhull andemu  15:56, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Outdoor-unit.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Outdoor-unit.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:17, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

July 2010
Please stop. If you continue to upload inappropriate images, such as File:Outdoor-unit.jpg, to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. '''Please STOP uploading images without appropriate copyright statements and claiming in the comments that they're all your own work - they are clearly not your work. If you carry on doing this, you will almost certainly be blocked.''' Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:19, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Acsplit.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Acsplit.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:22, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing, for a period of 48 hours, for You've been told and told, but you continue to upload files without the correct copyright info, or that are of dubious origin. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding the text  below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Ged UK  15:40, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

Karachi Cambridge School
Hi. As you don't appear to be too familiar with creating or editing Wikipedia articles, I suggest what you do is make a copy of Karachi Cambridge School in your user space, for example as the page User:Saudahmed66/Karachi Cambridge School. Then do your proposed changes there, and ask an experienced editor to review them for you before transferring them to the main article - I'd be happy to do that for you, if you tell me when you're ready. And please have a look through Your first article and other articles that link from it - you'll find lots of useful tips to help you get started editing. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:14, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

I like your advice, you see as I am now to here and don't know Wikipedia policies better, you could help me ,thank you.But I live in Pakistan and  I am a expert in Urdu, so can you help me in that.--Saudahmed66 (talk) 17:19, 13 July 2010 (UTC)


 * I've created your own copy for you, at User:Saudahmed66/Karachi Cambridge School. You can edit that, and if you let me know when you think you're done with it, I'll be happy to look over it for you and make any changes that may be needed. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:29, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

I have completed my editing atUser:Saudahmed66/Karachi Cambridge School --Saudahmed66 (talk) 18:19, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
 * OK, I'll have a look at it a little later. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:34, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

please make me an administrator--Saudahmed66 (talk) 18:25, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, I can't make you an admin - only the community can do that via the proper process. And admin isn't for beginners, sorry. You need lots of experience - probably 6 months minimum, and a few thousands edits first. Have a read of Administrators. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:34, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

thanks, but do read that article--Saudahmed66 (talk) 19:26, 13 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Hi. Your new version looks fine. I might make one or two minor changes, but I think you should be ok to copy it to the main article now. Just copy and paste everything from User:Saudahmed66/Karachi Cambridge School to Karachi Cambridge School and I'll look at it there. Don't worry about the removal of the image (below) - that's just because it wasn't allowed in your user space, but should be ok in the main article. I'll put it back in the main article once you've copied in your new version. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 07:32, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Non-free files in your user space
Hey there Saudahmed66, thank you for your contributions. I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:Saudahmed66/Karachi Cambridge School. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.


 * See a log of files removed today here.


 * Shut off the bot here.


 * Report errors here.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:05, 14 July 2010 (UTC)


 * That was my fault. I suggested Saudahmed66 should copy the article into his user space to work on, and I hadn't realised it contained a non-free image. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 07:33, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

no ,no .Its my fault Sorry!--Saudahmed66 (talk) 07:40, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Protection Template
Hello, I removed the template at the top of your talk page, as this page was not actually protected. If you would like to have it protected, you may want to ask an administrator. If you have any questions, please contact me on my talk page.Thanks,Acather96 (talk) 18:08, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Karachi Cambridge School, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — Jeff G. ツ 03:03, 15 July 2010 (UTC) see forgive me I will now be loyal to wkipedia.

Checkuserblock
checkuserblock is a template to be used only after a checkuser has been run, and only by people with checkuser privileges. Do not use it incorrectly as you did here.&mdash;Kww(talk) 19:22, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Information of a minor
Wikipedia policy does not allow personally identifiable information of a minor to be posted on wiki. As such, I have removed this from your userpage. Thank you for understanding, and please adhere to wikipedia policies. -- Avi (talk) 19:33, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Barnstar
Hi Saudahmed66 - Thanks for the barnstar! As to how you get them, you've simply got to do good work on Wikipedia - the more noticed the work is, the more likely you'll get one. The easiest way to get a barnstar is probably to work within one of the Wikipedia WikiProjects - coordinated groups working on particular subjects. Find a subject that you're interested in, and join in the work that's going on with the related project. If you woprk well there, other members of the project are likely to recognise what you're doing with a barnstar. Grutness...wha?  22:27, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Please stop putting the advert template on articles that are not at all written like advertisements - and in general, please take great care when adding templates to articles. You really shouldn't be doing this, giving barnstars to bots, asking for them yourself, and randomly trying out templates. You're very welcome here, of course, but you need to start at the beginning - do some small changes that you are confident of, make small improvements to the content of articles that you know about, and take your time to learn about how Wikipedia works. Don't rush things, and don't jump into areas you don't understand. And do ask for help when you need it. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 22:44, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

do we get paid for articles--SAUD (talk) 17:34, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
 * No, we don't. De728631 (talk) 10:17, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sarsabz (greenery)


The article Sarsabz (greenery) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Wikipedia is not a dictionary

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. De728631 (talk) 10:16, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

(+202)
(+202) means that 202 letters/characters where added to the page. Similarly, (-98) would mean that 98 letters/characters where deleted. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 19:56, 17 July 2010 (UTC) one more question.Do we here get paid.--Saudahmed66 (talk) 07:04, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Do we get paid? No, we don't - Wikipedia is a voluntary project. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:35, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Asad_s.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Asad_s.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Melesse (talk) 02:53, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

File:Asad_live.jpg
I have tagged File:Asad_live.jpg as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Use rationale examples. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 02:54, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Chef Asad Latif
A tag has been placed on Chef Asad Latif requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles – see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Kudpung (talk) 12:12, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lazzat with Asad


The article Lazzat with Asad has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable show.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ged UK  13:38, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Lazzat with Asad
I have nominated Lazzat with Asad, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Lazzat with Asad. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ged UK  20:48, 26 July 2010 (UTC) Please don't delete it ,but correct it.--Saudahmed66 (talk) 09:14, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Kcsimage.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Kcsimage.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 18:31, 31 July 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 18:31, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Kcsimage.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Kcsimage.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 12:41, 1 August 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 12:41, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Kcsimage.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Kcsimage.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. J Milburn (talk) 12:10, 4 August 2010 (UTC) Dear Milburn ,The picture of the school building has been mine and there is no source of it .so why should I apply for licence?--Saudahmed66 (talk) 16:02, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

change my profile
I want to transfer my all details to another profile ,please guide me! --Saudahmed66 (talk) 16:50, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Do you mean you want to change your username (this would also give you a new userpage and user talk page)?Acather96 (talk) 17:01, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

yes,but I want my contributions and watchlist to be the same one. --Saudahmed66 (talk) 06:02, 5 August 2010 (UTC) See WP:CHU Acather96 (talk) 07:02, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Newz (group)
A tag has been placed on Newz (group) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Reconsider !  08:28, 6 August 2010 (UTC) Please dont delete it at the meantime I am improving it --Saudahmed66 (talk) 08:34, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Newz copy.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Newz copy.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:47, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

STOP uploading images
Please stop uploading images without copyright information. You've been warned repeatedly on this talk page, and it is not acceptable. If you do it again, you will be blocked. Ged UK  17:37, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Lal-Qila.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Lal-Qila.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Skier Dude ( talk  03:37, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Qaida.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Qaida.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Skier Dude ( talk  03:40, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Ramadan moon.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Ramadan moon.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:05, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Alinawazisalinawazish.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Alinawazisalinawazish.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:06, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Ged UK  20:31, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

You've been told and told and told. STOP uploading images until you understand how copyright works. And be very careful about claiming images as your own when they clearly aren't. Ged  UK  20:37, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Banner pukaar.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Banner pukaar.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:06, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

LAST warning
I'm going to give you one FINAL warning about uploading images without licence info. If you do it again, I WILL block you again, for longer this time. EVERY image must have a licence included, no exceptions. Ged UK  15:10, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

I just wanted to help Wikipedia with the photo!.--Saudahmed66 (talk) 14:46, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
 * I know, but if you put up pictures/images without a licence, then Wikipedia is at risk legally from whoever owns the photo's rights. Ged  UK  09:48, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
 * I cant understand Licence ......--Saudahmed66 (talk) 14:59, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Then don't upload any more images. It's putting wikipedia at risk of copyright theft claims. Just stick to text. Ged  UK  08:12, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

Can I upload the picture and gave it to you when you confirm it ,then I can put it on Wikipedia.Is it OK? --Saudahmed66 (talk) 08:22, 25 August 2010 (UTC)


 * The best place to ask questions about copyright is at Media copyright questions; there's lots of experts there who'll be able to help you. Ged  UK  12:09, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Connect Communication
A tag has been placed on Connect Communication requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. &mdash; RHaworth 17:05, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Connect Communication


The article Connect Communication has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * no evidence of notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. &mdash; RHaworth 23:52, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

please don't delete this article as this is very important article but it may need some more information ,and I am collecting it. --Saudahmed66 (talk) 10:13, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of United King (bakery)
A tag has been placed on United King (bakery) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Kudpung (talk) 11:03, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of United King bakery
A tag has been placed on United King bakery, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Derild 49  21  ☼  13:19, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

United King bakery article
The article was deleted because it was an advertisement, with a promotional tone quite unsuitable for an encyclopedia. Phrases like "Our aim is to make delicious, hygienic and healthy food", "Our products continue to be made with the same attention to quality and detail ", and "the finest selection of baked products in Pakistan" are the sort of thing the company's PR department would write, and the use of "We" and "Our" makes clear that they are written on behalf of the company. If you are connected with the company or their PR advisers, you should not be writing about them - see WP:Conflict of interest. In any case, it will save you time writing articles which are deleted if you read these guidelines: JohnCD (talk) 15:23, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
 * WP:Your first article
 * WP:Verifiability - for any statement that might be challenged, you need a reliable source
 * WP:Notability - not every company, or every person, qualifies for a Wikipedia article
 * WP:Notability (organizations and companies)
 * WP:Neutral point of view - Wikipedia is not here to help promote anything
 * WP:PEACOCK


 * but please give me a chance!--Saudahmed66 (talk) 17:54, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, certainly you can have a chance, but if you want to write articles that will not be deleted you really need to read those guidelines, particularly WP:Your first article, and listen to advice. JohnCD (talk) 19:39, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
 * OK But please let me have the copy of that deleted article.--Saudahmed66 (talk) 09:30, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
 * See WP:RFUD Acather96 (talk) 09:37, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
 * I cannot put a copy in your user space, because advertisements are not permitted anywhere in Wikipedia; I have emailed a copy to you. JohnCD (talk) 15:21, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Nazir Ahmad.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Nazir Ahmad.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Acather96 (talk) 10:02, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo-connect.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Logo-connect.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:00, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Geo Dost
A tag has been placed on Geo Dost, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Yousou (talk) 10:46, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

September 2010
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Pakistan, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Green Giant (talk) 11:01, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Nazir Ahmad.jpg
A tag has been placed on File:Nazir Ahmad.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Acather96 (talk) 17:33, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Nusuh.GIF listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Nusuh.GIF, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Saqib Qayyum (talk) 10:43, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Muhammad image removal
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Muhammad, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.&mdash; Chowbok  ☠  14:16, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Dear Chowbok ,you should respect other religons ,as in Islam Muhammad 's Photo is supposed a bad act!--Saudahmed66 (talk) 16:44, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Why should your religion determine what I and others can and cannot view?&mdash; Chowbok  ☠  17:03, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

Respecting others religon !--Saudahmed66 (talk) 17:24, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Why?&mdash; Chowbok  ☠  19:47, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

This is an encyclopedia, not a personal view of a religion! --41.235.101.40 (talk) 22:11, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

Image tagging for File:Express247.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Express247.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:06, 9 October 2010 (UTC) ok--Saudahmed66 (talk) 12:16, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of S.A Suhail
A tag has been placed on S.A Suhail requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles – see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.  Nolelover  It's football season! 05:03, 23 October 2010 (UTC) I wannna write about myself there--Saudahmed66 (talk) 05:05, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Arsalanstien


A tag has been placed on Arsalanstien requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. -- Bk314159 (Talk to me and find out what I've done) 15:31, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Idara-i-Mas‘udia
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Idara-i-Mas‘udia, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.almazhar.com/about_us.php. As a copyright violation, Idara-i-Mas‘udia appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Idara-i-Mas‘udia has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Idara-i-Mas‘udia and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Idara-i-Mas‘udia with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Idara-i-Mas‘udia.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. --Misarxist 11:27, 25 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Al-Mazhar could also be redirected to the organisation if the article is recreated without copyvio. Sorry about above but copright is important.--Misarxist 11:29, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

Copyright problems with File:Asadfacebook.PNG
Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Asadfacebook.PNG, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, File:Asadfacebook.PNG appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Asadfacebook.PNG has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Asadfacebook.PNG and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:Asadfacebook.PNG with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:Asadfacebook.PNG.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 15:44, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

Copyright problems with File:GeoDost.jpg
Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:GeoDost.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, File:GeoDost.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:GeoDost.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:GeoDost.jpg and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:GeoDost.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:GeoDost.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 15:45, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Fb-logo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Fb-logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 05:19, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Enjoy Holiday (Facebook Page)


A tag has been placed on Enjoy Holiday (Facebook Page) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Jimmy Pitt  talk  15:47, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistent copyright infringement, as you did at Idara-i-Mas‘udia. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. VernoWhitney (talk) 22:19, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Fb-logo.png)
Thanks for uploading File:Fb-logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 05:03, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Almazhar.bmp.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Almazhar.bmp.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 06:05, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Karachicambridge.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Karachicambridge.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 15:03, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

Christmas Card


Merry Christmas At this festive time, I would like to say a very special thank you to my fellow editors, and take the time to wish you and your loved ones a very Merry Christmas, and a Happy New Year. And, in case you can't wait until the big day, I've left you each three special presents, click to unwrap :) Acather96 (talk) 10:10, 24 December 2010 (UTC)





File:Copy (2) of holiday.JPG listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Copy (2) of holiday.JPG, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Kelly hi! 21:44, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Pakistan earthquake (2011)


The article Pakistan earthquake (2011) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Very short unreferenced article. Delete per WP:NNEWS

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kudpung (talk) 05:58, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

January 2011
This is your last warning; the next time you create an inappropriate page, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ''Multiple creations and image uploads deleted. Numerous previous blocks.'' Kudpung (talk) 06:09, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

I think someone else is using my account and doing this all!--Saudahmed66 (talk) 07:48, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mujadidi Foundation


A tag has been placed on Mujadidi Foundation requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.  elektrik SHOOS  07:48, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mujadidi Foundation


A tag has been placed on Mujadidi Foundation requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Ravendrop 02:54, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

AN notification
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 18:48, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ibrahim Shahid


Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Ibrahim Shahid, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. bender235 (talk) 00:19, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

Continued inappropriate article creation
You continue to create inappropriate article content despite many notices on this talk page as to why they do not meet Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. This must stop now as it is disruptive. If you continue to create articles about clearly non-notable individuals it will lead to another block of your account. --Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 13:06, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Makkatower2.JPG
Thank you for uploading File:Makkatower2.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:44, 16 April 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 18:44, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

Blocked
Since you have again started uploading images in apparent violation of copyright and without any source documentation, after multiple prior warnings and several blocks, you have been blocked again, this time for a month. The next time will be an indefinite block. Fut.Perf. ☼ 18:49, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Dawood bank.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Dawood bank.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a template, along with your question, beneath this message.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 17:48, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Untitled-2 copy.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Untitled-2 copy.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:42, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

wikimedia Pakistan
Hello, I would like to invite you to please join the WIkimedia Pakistan mailing list. We're proposing to create Wikimedia Foundation chapter in Pakistan. Shortly, we'll plan a meetup in Karachi, if you interested to join us in the meetup, please show you interest. thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.110.236.89 (talk) 08:02, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Unilever pakistan.gif)
Thanks for uploading File:Unilever pakistan.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 13:21, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Surf Excel.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Surf Excel.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 15:02, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Nadra.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Nadra.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:29, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Bankofpunjab.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Bankofpunjab.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:12, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Google Pakistan listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Google Pakistan. Since you had some involvement with the Google Pakistan redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - TheChampionMan1234 02:36, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Islamabad Electric Supply Company (logo).gif
 Thanks for uploading File:Islamabad Electric Supply Company (logo).gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:38, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Google Pakistan concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Google Pakistan, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Google Pakistan


Hello, Saudahmed66. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Google Pakistan".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the  or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.  Onel 5969  TT me 20:56, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Nadra.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Nadra.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:29, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Saudahmed66/Karachi Cambridge School


A tag has been placed on User:Saudahmed66/Karachi Cambridge School requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. MB 01:04, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Saudahmed66/Karachi Cambridge School
User:Saudahmed66/Karachi Cambridge School, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Saudahmed66/Karachi Cambridge School and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of User:Saudahmed66/Karachi Cambridge School during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. MB 20:28, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Uniross.gif
Thanks for uploading File:Uniross.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:08, 4 November 2020 (UTC)