User talk:Sauljnewman

Blue Zone
The sources you are adding to blue zone are original research and unreliable, they do not mention "blue zones". I suggest you stop re-adding unreliable content or I will report your account and you may be blocked. You have not given any valid reason to include that content. Wikipedia is not a place to do our own original research. Content must be on topic and well sourced. Psychologist Guy (talk) 17:04, 18 September 2023 (UTC)


 * In what sense is simply adding a link quoting the japanese government "original research", or in any way unreliable? That is what you have been completely incapable of stating. I have given a valid reason: the blue zones claim that people in those zones eat vegetable based diets, are happy and socially connected, and live longer than other regions. These sources demostrate that is completely and utterly untrue, by referencing an independent and trusted source. One is literally cited as the example of a trustworthy source.
 * Stop blocking valid content based on independent, government-sourced, and veridically true statements. I am a professional demographer at one of the world's best universities, citing well-known givernment sources. Go ahead and report me, bring in an editor, and we can ask nthem to0 lock these criticisms on the page. Sauljnewman (talk) 19:04, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia isn't where you get to publish your discovery debunking "blue zones". Find some scientists who have questioned it and published in the peer-reviewed literature. Essentially you are asking Wikipedians to be your science paper reviewers. We aren't. No editor of a journal on geography or public health, for example, is going to ask me to review a paper on this topic. If you are a professional demographer, you should be able to find journals in your profession where you can publish. Or papers that have already done it which you can cite here. What you are demanding is that we be the journal reviewers for your research. -- M.boli (talk) 12:45, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Psychologist Guy (talk) 15:19, 24 September 2023 (UTC)