User talk:Saurabh226020

Recent edit to Chaudhary Charan Singh International Airport
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Chaudhary Charan Singh International Airport, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 08:24, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

March 2017
Hello, I'm Batternut. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Lucknow have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Batternut (talk) 01:12, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

April 2017

 * Please refrain from making falsifying edits as you did in Lucknow. Firstly, according to latest census 2011, Jaipur city-proper's population (3.046 million) exceeds that of both Lucknow city (2.817 million) and Lucknow urban agglomeration (2.902 million). Since the sources for these figures have been defined in the respective articles, I am not liable to give sources for these figures here for you. Even if we talk about districts (though district population figures have no place in city articles except in cases like Kolkata where Municipal Corporation covers and governs entire district area; only such districts are "city districts" which are 100% urban), Jaipur district's population (6.66 million) also far exceeds that of Lucknow district (4.59 million). So, on what basis do you claim that Lucknow (city/ district) is bigger than Jaipur (city/ district) or Jaipur is smaller than Lucknow ?

Also, why are you so keen to add North India ranking when it was already removed purposely ? North India is just a geographical region whose exact political boundaries are not confirmed since its definition varies as per different sources. In addition to that, your falsifying ranking of Lucknow and Jaipur makes it more controversial and unacceptable. Moreover, both Lucknow and Jaipur are not fit for this "North" ranking since Uttar Pradesh in some cases is considered to lie in Central India and Rajasthan in certain cases in Western India. Go through definition section of North India. There was a sound enough reason to remove the controversial city ranking of this so-called North India. I noticed you did the same thing (ranking Lucknow 2nd) a month ago. Besides, this time you removed the UA ranking of Lucknow in India (12th) which was much more important than North Indian ranking to mention in the article. Your edits have been reverted but such misleading edits will not be tolerated next time. Hope you got some enlightenment. Vibhss (talk) 23:34, 29 April 2017 (UTC)