User talk:Sauzer/Archive 1

Disambiguation link notification for February 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Baltimore City Public Schools, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Success Academy ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/List_of_Baltimore_City_Public_Schools check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/List_of_Baltimore_City_Public_Schools?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

...
You have no damned business in anyone else's sandbox...


 * The proper action is to send a mwssage... You have no damned business in anyone else's sandbox... GWFrog (talk) 02:24, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

A page you started (Baltimore Design School) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Baltimore Design School.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (Talk&#124;Contribs) 14:29, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Thanks for creating Bartlett-Hayward Company.

User:FULBERT while reviewing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

FULBERT (talk) 01:49, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

Autopatrolled granted
Hi Sauzer, I just wanted to let you know that I have [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&page=User%3ASauzer added] the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Autopatrolled. However, you should consider adding relevant wikiproject talk-page templates, stub-tags and categories to new articles that you create if you aren't already in the habit of doing so, since your articles will no longer be systematically checked by other editors (User:Evad37/rater and User:SD0001/StubSorter.js are useful scripts which can help). Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! ~Swarm~ {sting} 01:57, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Layout
Your script made a mistake here: Per Manual of Style/Layout the short description comes before the hatnotes. GA-RT-22 (talk) 18:12, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Hello, thanks for the correction. Unfortunately, this was me trusting the General Fixes script knew the MoS here, but I see in the talk that AWB has had this wrong for some time. I'll look into the revising the script before proceeding any further. Thanks again! Sauzer (talk) 18:19, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Looking into this discussion, this issue was fixed in the latest version of AWB. I just ran Rum and Coke through that version and it did not attempt to invert the order, so all seems well now. Thanks again for bringing this to my attention. Sauzer (talk) 22:16, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Hamilton, Baltimore
Hello there. I would like to nominate Hamilton, Baltimore for Good articles status. Before I do, I am curious if you would like to review it first or if the Baltimore Task Force should be included in the process. What do you think? —Monarchjogs (talk) 15:04, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
 * I'll be happy to give it a look in the next couple days. I don't have much experience with the GA process, but if I see anything that would improve it, I'll help out. I just ran it through AutoWikiBrowser on its most nitpicky setting, and it only changed a couple things to match the Manual of Style. The Baltimore WikiProject is unfortunately pretty quiet at the moment (I'm not sure if it's just that one or WikiProjects in general), so I'm not sure if you'd get much response there. Couldn't hurt though. I'll let you know when I've had a chance to read through it in detail, but I think it looks great already. Sauzer (talk) 18:32, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
 * I put the feelers out to the Baltimore Task Force in case anyone checks the discussion subpage: link here Sauzer (talk) 18:41, 18 April 2021 (UTC)