User talk:SavagePatchMan

October 2016
Hello, I'm Class455. An edit that you recently made to Alexander Dennis Enviro500 seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Class455 (talk) 03:30, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

Edits to Toronto subway
Hi, I noticed you recently tried to improve the Toronto subway page. However, some of your edits were not encyclopedic, several times you wrote "click here to see..." which is not appropriate for wikipedia. You also deleted sections, and information, and seem to want to split the article into different areas. For example you wrote "For details about the construction of Line 5, click here. For general information on light rail lines under construction and light rail lines being planned, click here." This is not the way to wikilink in wikipedia, and all those links you gave were, in fact, already in the article. So I had to revert, but I understand the edits were in good faith. Mattximus (talk) 01:35, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
 * To add to that, you don't need to mention or link this article to "Toronto rapid transit" as we had a discussion about moving "Toronto rapid transit" to "Toronto subway," essentially linking it to itself. Johnny Au  (talk/contributions) 02:05, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

October 2016
Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Toronto Transit Commission bus system. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. ''See WP:COPYEDIT. There is a major difference between "its" and "it's." Don't confuse the two.'' Johnny Au  (talk/contributions) 02:11, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Toronto Rapid Transit


Your recently created new page, Toronto Rapid Transit covers a topic on which we already have a page – Toronto subway. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Toronto subway – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Useddenim (talk) 03:11, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
 * I have made that page a redirect to Toronto subway per discussion at Talk:Toronto subway. Johnny Au  (talk/contributions) 14:34, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

November 2016
Hello, I'm Donner60. I noticed that in this edit to Toronto subway, you removed all the content without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, I restored the page's content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 22:37, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Toronto subway. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Meters (talk) 22:39, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm tempted to bump the level of this warning since this is obviously a reaction to having your article redirected... leave it alone. Meters (talk) 22:43, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Talk:Toronto Rapid Transit. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Meters (talk) 22:45, 6 November 2016 (UTC) You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 03:45, 7 November 2016 (UTC)