User talk:Savannahcallie/Evaluate an Article

Savannahcallie (talk) 01:38, 19 March 2021 (UTC) The article I choose was called an Anatomy of an epidemic. The article stayed on topic and was a very interesting article. The dates from the data in the article were outdated and can be updated with some new findings and comparisons. The article is a "C" class article and there are some gaps in the article that need to be filled because of the lack of information given. There is a section in the article with the heading "children" this heading only had 1-2 sentences explaining the effects of children when their parent are giving them drugs and how it would effect their daily lives the older they get. There could be more data showing the effects on a table or comparing data. The references this article has chosen are bias sources. It would make the article a better representation off this topic to show a broad and information. The references also come from some of the same authors or sources as well it is not really broad in this spectrum as well. When clicking on a few of the references link most of them worked but a few. When looking at the talk page there is a header that says "unbalanced view point" and within his header it talks about how some of references should be peer reviewed journal and no scientific article were referenced as well.