User talk:Saveeducation

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Vishal Kandukuri, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! MatthewVanitas (talk) 20:18, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

January 2013
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Vishal Kandukuri, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 22:24, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Why Was My Article Deleted?
That's the question you are probably asking yourself right now. Well, there are a couple of reasons your article could have been deleted:


 * 1) It may not have met the General notability guideline.  This is the guideline that all articles must meet before they can be included on Wikipedia.
 * 2) It may not have been notable.  If a subject isn't notable, it isn't included.  Your little brother's garage rock band with 5 fans isn't notable, but Metallica...that's notable.
 * 3) It may not have been verifiable.  If a subject hasn't been covered by third-party reliable sources, then we can't tell if an article on it is original research or even a hoax.
 * 4) It may have been deleted as advertising.  We are writing a neutral encyclopaedia, sometimes fans, enthusiasts and marketing folk find it difficult to write neutrally about the organisation that they care enough to write about. Any page about a company of any sort must meet strict guidelines so it isn't considered advertising.  A page about the local quickie-mart is probably advertising and also probably not notable.

We welcome articles written as part of educational assignments. But such articles must still meet our requirements. It might be useful for your project to be registered at the School and university projects WikiProject, and you can look there for some help specifically with educational projects. If your article is a translation of a Wikipedia article from another language version of Wikipedia, please remember to supply attribution by linking to the page you've translated in your edit summary

Sometimes we can get a little overhasty. So apologies if your article was deleted before you had the chance to add references or mention why the subject is notable. Please request it to be undeleted at Requests for undeletion.

We welcome new articles, but do encourage new authors to read WP:FIRST for advice on writing articles. Then read all the information you can on the subject. If you prefer working on a draft before submitting it, you can start articles in your sandbox (a subpage of your userpage). Add all the information, references, reliable sources and more to the page. Make sure it meets the General notability guideline. If you aren't sure, ask an admin; they will be glad to help. Then move it to where you want it in the main namespace (on the Wikipedia). From there, keep it updated with pertinent updated information, so the article doesn't become stale. When in doubt with anything, ask the Help desk or an admin. Hope this helps... Neutralhomer •  Talk  • 01:07, 4 January 2013 (UTC)


 * i am not at all aware of intention of this message. i am not concerned over any deleted article . thank youSaveeducation (talk) 15:10, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Discussions on Wikipedia
Hi Saveeducation, I notice that you post the same talk page messages in several places (my user talk page, Acroterion's talk page, and Talk:Vishal Kandukuri). I understand that you are doing this in order to make sure that everybody involved can see the messages, and your zeal is commendable. However, there is no need to post the same message on my talk page that you have posted to Talk:Vishal Kandukuri since I monitor that page, and the discussion should happen on Talk:Vishal Kandukuri in any case - so there is no reason for you to do the extra work of duplicating the messages. Thanks! --bonadea contributions talk 10:17, 4 January 2013 (UTC)


 * thank you for your contribution, i appreciate it. i hope the current version which you have edited is without any promotional tone, are peacock and copy editing tags still necessary ?Saveeducation (talk) 15:12, 4 January 2013 (UTC)Saveeducation (talk) 11:22, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Vadeptenergylogo.JPG)
Thanks for uploading File:Vadeptenergylogo.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:28, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/V Adept Energy concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/V Adept Energy, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 20:23, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/V Adept Energy


Hello Saveeducation. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "V Adept Energy".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 레비  Revi  con 08:30, 26 December 2013 (UTC)