User talk:Saveindia2009

Avoid POV
Your recent change on the ICFAI page seems to be NPOV policy voilation of Wikipedia. The earlier log on your page seems this is not new. Pl. be restrained in such cases and discuss changes on talk page before making changes. The change you made would be reverted if proper changes are not made ASAP with correct references. Thanks, Indian (talk) 00:46, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

Check it now, I am sure that the reference of Times of India will definiely work. Look I have not intention of thrusting my viewpoint but I just want to find out the organizations and entities which are trying to represent themselves as something they are not. Isn't it really reproachable that organzations with wrong credentials are using Wikipedia for promoting their brand. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.197.96.169 (talk) 04:43, 5 September 2009 (UTC) --

Dear User,

All you can do to "stop" someone is to come up with proper and substantiated views and not unsubstantiated personal views. The organization you spelled as scruplous may be "nationalist & patriotic" for a group of people. Come up with proper reasoning and try to create consent with other editors.

Thanks Indian (talk) 21:29, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

Dear User,

The only way to add constructively to Wikipedia is create consensus among the editors by using reliable and neutral sources (NPOV). Kindly discuss any proposed changes on talk pages of the articles/pages you are editing and try to create consensus. Random and unsubstantiated changes leads to WP:EW which is neither constructive nor stable. Further Nationality of a user should not affect his judgement of fair from unfair. All edits should be factual and WP:NEU.

Thanks Indian (talk) 16:52, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Dear User,

No one is barred from bringing "facts" to the front but they need to be from a neutral mindset. This has nothing to do with "Indian mentality". This is purely a wiki policy to avoid WP:WAR and in accordance with NPOV policy that has been crafted by global community and not a bunch of users from a particular organization or region.

Thanks Indian (talk) 10:54, 8 September 2009 (UTC)