User talk:Savibg24

Speedy deletion nomination of Donald e. super


A tag has been placed on Donald e. super, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia for multiple reasons. Please see the page to see the reasons. If the page has since been deleted, you can ask me the reasons by leaving a message on my user talk page.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Cyan  Gardevoir  (used EDIT!) 10:51, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for message. I deleted your recent article because I hope this helps  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  09:48, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
 * It did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines.
 * It was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Examples of unsourced claims presented as fact include: important... professor at several Universities... made significant contributions... rewarded for his hard work... His death was lamented by many around the world... respected for a range of important theories... significant progress... widely respected and revered &mdash; and that's just from the first two paragraphs.
 * The article was created in a single edit without wikilinks or references, and looks as if was copied from an unknown and possibly copyrighted source.
 * Most of the article is about his theory, not him


 * Your message on my page was removed my another admin, presumably because it was either a misplaced unblock request or in contravention of a block, but you should note that a possible copyright infringement was only one of the reasons for the deletion. The article did not identify reliable sources for its content, and was not neutral in tone.  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  07:36, 1 July 2012 (UTC)