User talk:Savs95

Welcome!
Hello, Savs95, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Romaine (talk) 14:20, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
 * PS: The project page can be found at: Benelux Education Program/Maastricht University/FPN Historical Book Review Spring 2017. Romaine (talk) 14:20, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Feedback on your article
Hello Savs95, Thank you for writing your article in your sandbox! I have read the article and would like to give some feedback to improve your article to Wikipedia standards and customs. I especially will look if it meets the quality standards we have on Wikipedia. I standard look for a series of subjects that need improvement or are okay. I hope you can implement this feedback to your sandbox article before our next meeting. Thanks! Romaine (talk) 09:45, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Intro sentence: excellent!
 * Links: Good start, but please look for keywords in your article and link them to other Wikipedia articles.
 * Headers: okay
 * References: Please add references behind the dot, without a space before the reference. But more important: more references are needed in the article. The more sources and references, the better the article. And
 * Context/timeframe: ?
 * How was the book received: ?
 * Other: Balance may be an issue in the article: the main text is about the Personal introduction, while the Essays part are not described.
 * Hello Savs95, Thank you for improving your article! Last week we specifically asked to make sure you add sources/references to your article, because that is one of the most important parts of a Wikipedia article. We also wanted to make sure the intro sentence/section is ready. Let's see how it is going now.
 * Intro sentence: excellent!
 * Links: good!
 * Headers: good! Only please change "Reviews" to "Reception".
 * References: The number of sources is sufficient, if you can find more this is always welcome! Please add if possible also references in the section "Book contents" to where certain parts come from in the book, like the chapter or page. You can use a single reference multiple times. Preferable every paragraph gets at least one reference, even if this is the same source as in another paragraph.
 * Context/timeframe: Missing!
 * How was the book received: okay
 * You need to work hard on the context/timeframe of when the book was published! Keep up the good work! Romaine (talk) 01:53, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Hi Savs95, The image you had requested to be scanned has been kept (and not deleted) because it is too simple to be copyrighted. I just added it to your sandbox article. Romaine (talk) 02:29, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
Nice article.

AngelaChong (talk) 18:22, 25 May 2017 (UTC) 