User talk:Sawjared

May 2020
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Crucifixion of Jesus. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 09:31, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

My edits were an attempt to get the article to read in a more balanced manner instead of the heavily religious bias it currently carries Sawjared (talk) 09:32, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia summarizes what independent reliable sources state. If others are disputing your edits, you need to discuss the concern on the article talk page.  Note that Wikipedia does not claim to be free of bias; any bias in sources will be reflected in Wikipedia.  Wikipedia presents the sources of information so readers can evaluate them and judge them for themselves as to their accuracy or level of bias. 331dot (talk) 09:36, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

Except the sources are not independent reliable sources, they are all theological authors with the aim of furthering their cause. There is zero balance to the article. I have raised the issue with the editor. Sawjared (talk) 09:41, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Then you should allow that discussion to take place. If you are unable to reach a consensus, then you can move to dispute resolution. 331dot (talk) 09:42, 22 May 2020 (UTC)