User talk:Sawtysh

Gauriganj Darpan moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Gauriganj Darpan, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:24, 24 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi, I have moved this into drafts, because the article only cites one source (its own website), which is not enough to establish notability or even to verify the information. Notability requires significant coverage in multiple independent and reliable secondary sources (see WP:GNG / WP:ORGCRIT).
 * Furthermore, as you have declared a COI with regards to this subject, you should not be publishing the article directly anyway, and must instead put it through the AfC review process (see WP:COIEDIT).
 * Finally, on the point of COI, if you are paid to edit this article (including if you are employed or otherwise engaged by the organisation in question) you must also separately disclose that. I will post another message below which tells you how to do that.
 * Thanks, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:31, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

April 2022
Hello Sawtysh. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Gauriganj Darpan, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Sawtysh. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:32, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Gauriganj Darpan


Hello, Sawtysh. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Gauriganj Darpan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗ plicit  23:41, 24 October 2022 (UTC)