User talk:Saxifrage/Troll droppings

My non-linear troll

 * This section was originally a section of my Talk page that I entitled A troll in Étincelle's name, until it took up too much room and deserved a subpage of its own.

Round 1
I have taken the time to read the arguments you have had with Etincelle (In the Archive 3 page). This is necessary in order for someone to understand and eventually defeat the oppressor. Your inflexibility and closed mindedness has already become legendary. I believe that you fail to see what is truly happening here, and eventually this will be your undoing. Anyone being of sound mind can understand that tyranny, by design cannot survive. You, saxifrage and those like you who cling to outdated notions of opinion being justified by the majority will therefore become victims of the very same philosophy you claim to uphold and defend. The justification of slavery was once the opinion of the majority, and now their immoral opinion has permanently changed the way history looks at them and so this will eventually happen to you. Anyone who has stained another man's blood will have his blood stained, and anyone who has slapped a face will have their face slapped.

I speak for Etincelle, and for all of your past victims during your rise to world doomination. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 4.236.195.153 (talk • contribs).


 * I think I'm going to accept the risk of being labelled an elitist meritocrat for ignoring the pretentious posings of an anonymous Internet user. &mdash; Saxifrage &#9998; 11:40, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

When you are taken out, and wonder why then you will remember me. I need no name. I represent the solution for Tyranny. I am that which cannot be defined by all the books in all the world. I am the darkness within the light. I am life, I am death. I am the beginning and the ending. It is all beyond your comprehension, my son. You will know me when it happens, when all of this will be erased forever by the passage of time.

I speak for Etincelle, and for all of your past victims during your rise to world doomination. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.2.160.25 (talk • contribs).


 * And you're full of yourself—you forgot that one. Are you deliberately spelling "domination" wrong? &mdash; Saxifrage &#9998; 19:53, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

Is that not the pot calling the kettle black? I read that argument you had with Etincelle, did you? Besides, I would rather be full of myself than to be like you - full of you know what. Now little boy, let me explain the difference between doomination and domination. Domination is a condition in which one has control over another. Doomination is a condition in which tyranny causes death and destruction to another nation. Whether there is one or ten, the result is the same. Thousands have come and gone with nothing to leave behind except stones bearing the historical records - mere evidence of their lives but no absolute truth. Thus, where absolute truth does not exist and a power vacuum remains, we have people like you... Waiting to fill what has come and gone and unaware that what has been filled will eventually be emptied. Do you realize that you, and those like you have little time left on this website? We don't even need to take any action. Your actions shall suffice. All we need to do now is to wait and watch.

I speak for Etincelle, and for all of your past victims during your rise to world doomination. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 216.194.4.74 (talk • contribs).


 * Oh, please do continue. I have my very own troll! And look at how grown-up and important it is, making up new words and even employing cute little bits of rhetoric to try to make me feel small! I'm so proud.
 * Or wait... Are you taunting anyone else?! I'm a jealous editor, and I won't have it! You tell that hussy it's over! I won't have my trolls being unfaithful to me, you hear? Good. &mdash; Saxifrage &#9998; 21:46, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

Continue? Continue what? There is no need for that. Why don't YOU continue? Yes! Go and continue all that you can continue. Keep going and keep trying, do it again and again. Wash, rinse and repeat, then wash rinse and repeat again! Why do I ask for you to continue? Because the more evil things the evil dictator does, the sooner he will be exiled. You are right about one thing. You're a jealous editor. You won't allow a differing opinion other than yours. That is another reason why Etincelle was right about you. You need a cranial rectal extraction. In other words, get your head out of your ass.

I speak for Etincelle, and for all of your past victims during your rise to world doomination. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 216.194.0.174 (talk • contribs).


 * So right you are! Your total lack of efforts is entirely justified! In fact, only if you were doing something to further your aims would you be contradicting yourself, something like, say, writing in support of your goals. Good thing you're not doing that! Boy, would it look dumb if you were. &mdash; Saxifrage &#9998; 19:58, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

I'm not going away. I wait, I watch, I tell you what you need to know. I tell your future. Your future is condemnation. In the end, my words will come back to haunt you, as you realize that you should have listened. My goal is your removal. I need not take any action or say anything to attain my goals. My goals will be fulfilled because I look at this universe without the burden of linear time. The past is the present, and the present is the future. They all are part of this linear universe and they cannot be changed. I see what has happened, what will happen and what is happening. By your own words you will be removed, by your own words you will be condemned.

I speak for Etincelle, and for all of your past victims during your rise to world doomination. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 216.194.1.111 (talk • contribs).


 * OMG I HAVE A TIME-TRAVELLING TROLL! You're teh best evar! I come back from a week's break and you bring me the nicest presents!
 * By the way, you don't need to keep repeating that last line. It's already on the page four times and though I think I might have had a chance of missing it when there were only three, I'm pretty sure I've got the hang of this reading thing now and there's no longer any danger of it being overlooked. &mdash; Saxifrage ✎ 09:43, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

I do not travel through time. I exist outside linear time. While I write this reply to your message, I remember that I have seen myself doing this before. Time is an invention of human perception. I saw what you will do and I see what you have done. You still do not understand the situation that you are about to place yourself in. You and those like you will be replaced. You will forever be erased through the passage of your linear time. Your life will be forgotten, your accomplishments will be lost throughout history. So it has occured and so it shall be. As humanity improves itself, you and those like you will be condemned because of your stubbornness and inflexibility. You will not be found because nobody will look for you. You will be replaced by people like Etincelle. Your victims will inherit that which you have stolen. What has risen will fall, and what has fallen will not be found.

I speak for Etincelle, and for all of your past victims during your rise to world doomination. I speak for Etincelle, and for all of your past victims during your rise to world doomination. I speak for Etincelle, and for all of your past victims during your rise to world doomination.

P.S.

I speak for Etincelle, and for all of your past victims during your rise to world doomination. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 216.194.2.245 (talk • contribs).


 * You keep forgetting to sign your posts. It's almost as if you're completely clueless about the medium that you use. Good thing your knowledge of behaviour, motivation, social systems, and history are entirely different and are perfect and flawless!
 * And all that stuff? I think you've got the wrong person. I don't aspire to any of that crap and I think you failed to read the primary texts that my conversation with Étincelle were in reference to—his aim was to make policy less flexible, not more. But let's not bother with facts! They are inconvenient, and, besides, you already know all that because you're a supra-linear time-troll being who has nothing better to do. Even non-linear trolls should remember to take their medication, though. &mdash; Saxifrage ✎ 07:28, 11 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Aw, my troll seems to be gone. You're no fun anymore! &mdash; Saxifrage ✎ 02:48, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

I keep the universe in motion. I am the facilitator of all life in the cosmos. I am a very busy being. Just because I do not reply when you want me to, that does not mean that I am gone, you brazen inferior human insect. You dare to engage me in a debate? You fool! You know not what you profess to know.

You, saxifrage and those like you who cling to outdated notions of opinion being justified by the majority will therefore become victims of the very same philosophy you claim to uphold and defend.

So far, I spoke for Etincelle, and for all of your past victims during your rise to world doomination. But now Etincelle will speak for me. Let's bother with facts, shall we? The folowing quotes came from Etincelle. Your dismal attempt to change the facts has failed.

Here is what Etincelle said. Don't forget or others will refresh your memory.

Even a majority should not control a talk page. You don't realize how important this is. -Étincelle (formerly Lumiere) 03:55, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

Therefore, until after I see that you and others adopt a more logical and open minded attitude, I don't think that such a superficial majority will be taken into account. Does this answer your question? A real consensus based on thoughtful discussions will be needed. -Étincelle (formerly Lumiere) 12:30, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

You are just trying to convince yourself that a majority can exclude the views of others from the talk page. You are so blind that you cannot see the facts. -Étincelle (formerly Lumiere) 21:28, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

The bottom line here is that you think that because there is a majority on your side that you are right. -Étincelle (formerly Lumiere) 01:44, 12

If no consensus can be obtained to change the policy despite an environment that does not suppress opinions, this is excellent. It proves that there is a meaningful support from the community for the policy. Otherwise, it only proves that a group of editors, perhaps a majority but maybe not, is afraid that eventually there will be a consensus against their view. Even if it was a large majority, such a majority should not feel the need to suppress the opinions of a minority, as if they were afraid that these opinions could gain in popularity. Proposing an interpretation of policies and guidelines to support a suppression of opinions from a policy talk page, would not make it right. The policy talk page is the natural place to express an opinion that is specifically about the policy. You can require that at some point we also express this opinion to a larger group in the Village pump. Sure, but it is natural to first discuss it in the policy talk page where it has the appropriate visibility. -Étincelle (formerly Lumiere) 12:09, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

Etincelle spoke for me, and for Etincelle's partners who you victimized during your rise to world doomination. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 216.194.58.20 (talk • contribs).


 * Uh huh. O supreme being, That Which Cannot Be Bothered To Use Proper Punctuation, Diacritics, Or Any Kind Of Formatting, you missed the part where Étincelle wanted people to stop using their "majority" to suppress his attempt to make the policy more rigid. A real Thing That Makes The Universe Go wouldn't makes such a mistake, or bother writing here for that matter. I mean, the Universe is going to do what it's going to do and your wangsting about it here doesn't change that. The pretense you put up about being some special entity is weird, sad, and definitely pathetic. So, due to your stupid mistake: Point for me, game loss. Now get off my Talk page, because you've repeated yourself enough that you're boring me. &mdash; Saxifrage ✎ 20:08, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

Round 2
So, are we supposed to assume that you know how to use proper punctuation and diacritics when you use words like "Uh huh. O supreme being"? Here's a newsflash for you, my little insect human friend. As long as you continue to impose your will onto others and give them a hard time, I will be here to torture you. Your telling me what Etincelle wanted is your delusion and it is completely irrelevant. Etincelle and I have clearly told you what your problem is, but it seems that you lack the necessary brain power to listen and understand.

However, I am not completely unreasonable, so I will change my signature.

I speak for what you hate or cannot tolerate. I do what must be done to correct your injustice. I am what you cannot understand. I am your nemesis. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 172.145.35.172 (talk • contribs).


 * Hah! I hit close to home there—you've started insulting me. Okay, you can stay now that you've started amusing me again.
 * And, yes, you obviously-underschooled overbeing, using onomatopœic phrases like "uh huh" is entirely consistent with a grasp of proper punctuation and use of diacritics. It's called communicative competence and reflects my high comfort level with the medium through which I communicate with you, O tiny-brained one, and is something you might look into acquiring. And, for your edification, since you obviously need it so much, "O" is spelled perfectly correctly—the "oh" spelling is a degenerate hypercorrection of the form properly used in an apostrophe. I can spell (and pronounce) Étincelle right; why don't you come back when your phenomenal cosmic power has developed sufficiently to let you spell and reason at a level high enough to engage with me without making you the fool?
 * You're not what I hate and cannot tolerate. These things, for all people, lie within, and last I checked my psyche wasn't manifesting itself as a smugly ignorant and self-important troll on teh intarwebs. You are certainly not my nemesis, but I'm flattered that you aspire to such importance and significance in the world. You're just not there currently. &mdash; Saxifrage ✎ 05:30, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

I just started insulting you? You idiot, you talk so much crap what do you use your ass for? Your perception of reality is so out of focus that I am surprised that you are actually able to communicate using this form of communication. For your information, I have been insulting you since day one. Now, since we are in the moode to analyze each other, let me explain what is going on here.

This discussion of ours is progressing according to my specifications. You have little information on me so you have been forced to insult me with what little information I have provided you. Those things are:

1).

Criticism of my language, grammar and punctuation skills

2).

Criticism of my claims of non linear existance

3).

Etincelle's argument with you.

Now, don't feel so bad about this. I have not given you a choice. Whether my words amuse you or not is not relevant to me. I will continue to be a thorn at your side whether or not I am amusing you. I am communicating with you using a form which I created which has disguised my identity. Everything which I have said and done has been according to my plan. It is obvious that this discussion is being controlled by me. This is evidence of what I am capable of. Have you not noticed the radical change in what I have been saying to you? This is evidence that what I am saying is true. You still do not have the intellectual capacity to understand or predict the eventual outcome of this. So, when I said that I know what will happen, that is only because I am forcing you to follow the only escape I have provided you. I gave you a completely ridiculous statement and you then criticise it. I use poor language skills and you criticise it. Actually, I am surprised that it took you this long to take the only escape which I have provided you. Your criticism of me has been so weak and predictable that I suppose I have overestimated your level of intelligence. Perhaps I should have chosen someone else like you, but that cannot be changed because those are the limitations of the past.

Despite all of this, there are some things that I have been pointing out that you have completely ignored. This is because you cannot talk about this without making yourself look like a fool. Some of those things are:

1).

Your stubbornness and inflexibility

2).

Your eventual removal from this place

3).

Your tendency to suppress opinions which are not in agreement with yours

You are allowed to criticize my language skills and my claims of a non linear existence. You are allowed to criticize what Etincelle said about how flexible the policy should have been. Anything outside of this not an option for you and you will fall into my trap. Do you really think that I have felt insulted by you? No, my friend. You are on your way out. Try insulting me with something more creative. Maybe then I will be amused. And now, a word from our sponsor.

I speak for what you hate or cannot tolerate. I do what must be done to correct your injustice. I am what you cannot understand. I am your nemesis. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 216.194.0.182 (talk • contribs).


 * Nonono, you don't understand. I'm not criticising you, I'm mocking you. There's a big difference: critisising you would imply that I have at least enough regard about your actions to call you to task. As it is, I'm just pointing and laughing. Of course you're deliberately presenting yourself as a dunce, why didn't I think of that! What a great way to show me up and make me look like an dumbass. Yeah. Awesome comeback there.
 * The fact that you're using an open proxy to anonymise yourself was obvious from the beginning, since my traces on you always returned random results. That's too bad, because I would have liked to show you the block you live on in a satellite map, but, alas, the internet is all growed up and these day any idiot can use an anoymiser even if they don't understand what the "form" they're using actually does. (I mean, really, Sollog could do it, and he's a social and technological buffoon.) Although, I'd recommend finding a new "form", because the one you've got is obviously suffering some kind of partial resource failure: four out of the last five comments you've made have all come from Metconnect's /16 address pool, which does narrow you down somewhat.
 * Now I'm going to mock you about your lack of ability to understand and correctly use the word "evidence": Mock mock mock. Ha, look at the monkey at the typewriter.
 * Now I'm going to mock you on losing your cool (you do realise you write more when you're piqued, yes?): Mock mock mock, look at the helpless fish flopping around.
 * Now that that's taken care of, do you have anything new to say, or are you just going to keep flapping your fingers at me as you've been? &mdash; Saxifrage ✎ 23:32, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

I'm using an anonymous proxy? That's news to me! You tried to trace my IP? If that is true, then why are you trying to put little importance on what I am saying here? Is it because I'm getting under your skin? Why would someone trace my IP if the things I am saying are only something to make fun of? You say you are mocking me? I doubt it. I am getting under your skin. Aside from the fact that you have proven yourself to be an idiot, you have become dishonest as well. You want to know who I am so you trace my IP. You make fun of my english usage? It is what I expected. Are my feelings supposed to be hurt? I should not have lured you into limited responses. You are coming to wrong conclusions about everything that is said here because of your inferior intellectual capacity. That's ok. It is part of history. I should not have put such high expectations on you. You want me to say something new? I won't say anything new until you come up with something better to say. How about talking about those things I pointed out? That's right. I got you and you know it. You can't talk about it because you know that you'll look like a bigger idiot than you are already.

I speak for what you hate or cannot tolerate. I do what must be done to correct your injustice. I am what you cannot understand. I am your nemesis. Etincelle was right about you. You are on your way out. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 216.194.1.99 (talk • contribs).


 * Tracing the IP of an anonymous internet troll is the first thing anyone competent does, and your assuming it has some eldritch meaning just emphasises your lack of familiarity with the basics of this game. And, blustering like that is a lame blunder. I mean, duh, if it turned up results then I would have more material with which to mock you. Think before you type!
 * I stopped playing Cowboys and Indians a long time ago, and even when I was seven it was boring and stupid when someone answered a called hit with, "No you didn't! I got you!" So, at my ripe old age, answering my insightful assessment of your agitation with the assertion that, no, I didn't get to you but rather you got to me, is boring and stupid to a degree that makes the boringness and stupidity of a seven year old pale in comparison. And, since I have to spell out so much for you as your previous blunder seems to indicate, I must point out that this makes it a losing move for anyone over the age of seven, and a pathetic one at that. Point for me, game loss. Would you like to play again? &mdash; Saxifrage ✎ 18:03, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

Round 3
Let me tell you something Bambi. You do not decide what is going on here, I do. It is I who is calling you out and it is I who is here to make your life miserable. It was you who first decided to somehow degrade the meaning of all of this but I never agreed with your assessment. You are a stubborn dumbass who can't take a differing opinion other then your own and you force your "holier than thou" attitude on others. I am here to defend your victims and as long as you continue to deprive the freedoms of others, I will be here to torture you and make your life miserable. I am here to defend those who cannot defend themselves against you. So you can call me whatever you want, you can declare the game "finished" as much as you want but I am here to stay. There is a price to pay for wrongdoing and that price is my condemnation of your evil. If you want me to go away then you must unconditionally surrender your position here and discontinue your acts of evil and leave Wikipedia for all time (which you will do eventually). There is nothing you can say or do to get me to leave you alone here so don't bother. I am ready to stay here months or years. The choice is yours.

I speak for what you hate or cannot tolerate. I do what must be done to correct your injustice. I am what you cannot understand. I am your nemesis. Etincelle was right about you. You are on your way out. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 216.194.0.111 (talk • contribs).


 * Geez, you're doing a phenomenally crappy job of calling the shots and taking me to task, if that's what you think you've been doing. Not to mention that whole failing to make me miserable or feel the slightest bit tortured. I mean, I'm playing this like a game, and I enjoy games. How in the non-linear universe do you think I'll stop enjoying this when it's child's play for me? Your utter lack of potency must be galling to you. Well, here's round three, as you desire. But, man, that was a shitty opening move. &mdash; Saxifrage ✎ 21:14, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

Have you ever heard of Chinese Water Torture?

It seems stupid and insignificant at first, and you don't think it will hurt you. Then, after a long time, it feels like a hammer hitting you on your head. In caves, it takes a very long time for water to drill a hole into a rock but it happens eventually. I have all of eternity to complete my task. Even if I have to wait until you die of old age, I will win. If it takes decades then it will take decades, but I will be the victor and to the victor goes the spoils.

Idiots like you like to talk and talk. You think that you know everything until something happens that will make you feel you really knew nothing. Let me tell you something. I have not been turning up the volume. I debate according to the strength of my opponents, and so far you have been very weak. I am just getting started. I am here for the long haul so if you think I am doing a terrible job of calling the shots, it's because you have not been too much of a challenge for me. In my past I have won hundreds of debates due to my years of experience. You are just another future loser. The reason for all of this is because I have already got you by the balls. You are still not capable of talking about those things I have mentioned because you know that you will not be able to stop yourself from looking like a bigger idiot than you already are. If I am doing a terrible job calling the shots and if what I am saying is nothing but child's play, then why won't you answer my questions?

I thought so.

I speak for what you hate or cannot tolerate. I do what must be done to correct your injustice. I am what you cannot understand. I am your nemesis. Etincelle was right about you. You are on your way out. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.90.100.88 (talk • contribs).


 * I don't answer your questions because I don't care about you, and so I don't care about what's important to you. That's where this differs in a fundamental way from Chinese water torture: you don't have me strapped to a table, so I can ignore you when you bore me. You're just not that important. Got any more inadequate analogies? &mdash; Saxifrage ✎ 23:12, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

You don't answer them because you can't. Otherwise, you'd look more like a fool. I have you strapped to a table. Don't believe me? WATCH!

My knowledge far exceeds yours, so now we shall take this to the next level.

I speak for what you hate or cannot tolerate. I do what must be done to correct your injustice. I am what you cannot understand. I am your nemesis. Etincelle was right about you. You are on your way out. {[subst:unsigned|216.194.56.137}}


 * You're repeating yourself again. If you hadn't just enticed me with a promise to make this more interesting ("take it to the next level"), you would have just had the quickest game-loss yet! For the record, you can't just childishly say "no! no! no! I'm right!", just repeating your assertions without new arguments, and expect to be treated like an competent adult who can play this game.
 * Oh, and your table is illusory. All the vandalism that you did was quickly reverted as if it never was. That is one of the strengths of Wikipedia. Also, your knowledge is flawed: hermaphrodite is a gender (albeit a rare one), not "no gender" as you seem to believe. A further flaw was shown when you made the mistake of writing "I need no food", because Serge was referring to an entirely unrelated "troll" who is operating elsewhere. Your claims of omniscience don't hold water any better than a sieve, aside from the fact that they were ridiculous on their face to begin with. &mdash; Saxifrage ✎ 19:29, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

Here is the problem with what you are asking of me. It is your inflexibility that makes new arguments moot. If you had an open mind, then maybe new arguments would work with you. Besides, the sheer amount of people who keep telling you that you are wrong should be enough new arguments to prove that Etincelle and I are right about you. The vandalism can continue with such frequency that you will have a hard time putting everything back again, that is what my army is for. That is yet another among infinite levels to go. You try to use technical things to prove my arguments technically incorrect, yet you call me a "troll" when trolls are creatures based on myth and not reality. But since you have defined such parameters on me, then I can say that I am the embodiment of all trolls and all trolls are what I am, so technically that makes me correct and you technically incorrect. Why? Because I am non-linear, remember? This game is beginning to bore you, I can sense that. How much boredom does it take to make you suffer? I will find out.

I speak for what you hate or cannot tolerate. I do what must be done to correct your injustice. I am what you cannot understand. I am your nemesis. Etincelle was right about you. You are on your way out. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 216.194.0.181 (talk • contribs).


 * Yeah, you're repeating yourself again and you're right, I am bored of this. And even before I read your boring addition to this conversation, D-Rock's message to me made me realise (as I wrote) that I'm being selfish and using up Wikipedia's resources by amusing myself with this troll-baiting.
 * And, for your information, you are an internet troll, not a mythical troll. You can assume for the sake of completeness that I have written something mocking about your pretension to knowledge and omniscience here, but I can't be bothered to write it anymore.
 * I would say, "point for me, game loss," but that would require this to continue to have some relevance to me. Then again, you've gained my apathy, and I suppose that's an even greater loss. Alright then, game over. Nice playing with you. Cheers! &mdash; Saxifrage ✎ 22:29, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

I do not believe you. You will be tested. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 216.194.4.174 (talk • contribs).

You have failed my test. I have given you the chance to obtain absolution but you refused to accept it. Your punishment is eternal condemnation.

I speak for what you hate or cannot tolerate. I do what must be done to correct your injustice. I am what you cannot understand. I am your nemesis. Etincelle was right about you. You are on your way out. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 216.194.3.86 (talk • contribs).

Hasn't given up yet, it seems
This is a case in which you are forced to listen instead of forcing your crap down the throats of your victims. So shall it be when you are forced out of this place because soon you will find that you will not be welcome here. Yes! Continue not to listen! Trust me, sooner or later, you will listen to the sound of the hammer that judges your wicked soul for all eternity when I will be given the right gaze upon you and I will have a smile on my face. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.194.3.58 (talk • contribs) 00:27 August 11, 2006

I will never give it up. It has already been written in the annals of time. You and those like you will be forever erased from this place. It will be done, so it shall be. You will see.

Comments removed from my talk page
You don't listen to anyone. Foolish child. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.194.1.80 (talk • contribs) August 25, 2006

Another person got pissed off at you? The more enemies people have, the closer people are to total destruction. How many enemies will you get until you stop your abuse? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.194.1.80 (talk • contribs) August 25, 2006

Another one! How many more complaints will it take to convince you that you are wrong just as we say you are? The damned do not listen, so the damned cannot learn. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.194.1.80 (talk • contribs) August 25, 2006

Do not expect him to make decisions in your favor. You will have to put back the information yourself, Anita. One day, he will leave this place and freedom will ring. Until then, fight for your rights so that others will enjoy them as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.194.1.80 (talk • contribs) August 25, 2006

Ignoring a problem does not make it go away you idiot. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.36.121.34 (talk • contribs) September 11, 2006


 * I told you that I'm done wasting Wikipedia's resources on feeding you. Go get your ego boosts somewhere else. This is the last thing you'll hear from me directly. &mdash; Saxifrage ✎ 22:16, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

You must be the biggest idiot on this planet.

I told you that I will never be done. I need no food. I will be here to torture you until you leave this place. I will never go away even if you do not answer my messages. From time after time the enemy must be beaten. In the name of all that is true and just and fair, my mission is to punish those who would violate the freedoms which are given to us by the supreme moral laws, that which must be fought for, not just given away. Therefore, whoever does evil must be punished. Time has no meaning for me, but for you, your time in this place will soon be at it's end. I may decide call upon my brothers and sisters of my army. You might not want to talk to me, but how will you deal with all of them? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.194.2.248 (talk • contribs) September 11, 2006