User talk:SayOneYes

June 2023
 Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of username and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text  at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must: Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text  at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 12:22, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you wrote this request with the aid of a bot, please don't. 331dot (talk) 15:51, 15 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Thank you for appreciating my ability to write texts, but I don't believe extraordinary skills are necessary to write an article on Wikipedia, as you also provide a guide for anyone who wants to contribute to the site (please do not interpret this as being malicious or with an unpleasant tone). Perhaps in your perspective, it may seem like advertising, but generally, any content about a brand or product can be considered "advertising by another name." In my case, even if the article I wrote seemed that way, it was due to human factors or my carelessness in editing the article, as we did not have the intention to promote ourselves on Wikipedia. We have many other sources where we can promote ourselves, and we understand better the kind of traffic we pay for. The purpose was to have a page describing our brand, similar to other brands, with no ill intentions behind it.
 * I understand that Wikipedia aims to summarize information from independent sources. However, I believe you are well aware that hundreds of thousands of products and brands exist on platforms like Amazon. It is unlikely that reliable sources will cover all brands, and it may not be something we or our grandchildren will witness firsthand.
 * Regarding the link placed from Amazon, it was primarily intended to increase trust that we are a genuine brand and to prevent the misuse of our registered name by others for malicious purposes. If our goal was promotion, I could have included all our social media platforms and websites where we sell our products.
 * Thank you for your attention, and I hope we can reach a compromise. SayOneYes (talk) 09:52, 16 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Wikipedia is not a business directory, so a company is not entitled to have a Wikipedia article just because it exists. All topics must be notable by Wikipedia's definition to merit inclusion. In the specific case of a company, it must meet the notability criteria for companies and organizations. For this to happen, the company must have already received significant coverage in multiple reliable and independent sources. We have no interest in what a company wishes to say about itself, as this is an inherent conflict of interest. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 17:10, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Understood, thanks for the reply. SayOneYes (talk) 10:32, 17 June 2023 (UTC)