User talk:Sayonara101

July 2013
Thank you for trying to keep Wikipedia free of vandalism. However, one or more edits you labeled as vandalism, such as the edit at Xinjiang, are not considered vandalism under Wikipedia policy. Wikipedia has a stricter definition of the word "vandalism" than common usage, and mislabeling edits as vandalism can discourage newer editors. Please read NOTVAND for more information on what is and is not considered vandalism. Thank you. The next time this occurs, you may be blocked. GotR Talk 17:18, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Fine, if you don't take it as vandalism, however I hope you checked the background of the hard facts and ignorance you might have in the regard, it's obvious to happen, don't take it personally, however instead of making disruptive changes I would humbly suggest to add things in constrictive way, and not based upon the personal issues(views) with any race/ethnicity/people/society. Of course there are plenty of references available out there, both offline and online, and I hope you will first go through them for having better idea, and reach to the consensus. I am not reverting your edit right now to go for edit-war, in the hope that you will take time to look at the issue more sincerely.Sayonara101 (talk) 08:58, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
 * "Xinjiang" should be an overview article, so such a section is clearly WP:UNDUE there, though not necessarily so elsewhere. And much of what I scrutinise on my watchlist is for real vandalism and glaring POV; if historical/political/cultural content is unsourced and from sources known to advocate a clear POV, then I will revert its addition. GotR Talk 16:50, 9 July 2013 (UTC)