User talk:Sayyed Bastami

Feel free and comment !

October 2012
Your recent editing history at Genocides in history ‎ shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 01:54, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

Courtesy notice
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 02:40, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

Warning
Do not do this again. Wikipedia has a policy that forbids threats or harrasment. The only reason I have not blocked this account is the editor on whose page this was posted appears unimpressed by your rhetoric. Other admins may see the situation differently.  Tide  rolls  02:51, 21 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Come on man ! ColaXtra is simply denying that Sabra and Shatila was a genocide How ridiculous, for example, to have things like Sabra and Shatila described as "genocide".
 * And you are giving me warning because I posted some truth about genocide in Iran.
 * Where is the warning for ColaXtra for deleting my post ?
 * Wikipedia is enough impartial and objective ? I dont think so.

My warning clearly referenced threats and harassment, and avoided comment on your dispute with ColaXtr by design. At the moment I have no opinion on the dispute. You need to concentrate on what my post said and avoid matters that were not discussed. I understand you are of the opinion that the dispute is the central point and I encourage you to pursue your point with all due vigor, but you must do so within Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Because ColaXtra does not appear to be concerned with your threat, I am willing to chalk this matter up to inexperience and acting in the heat of the moment. However, if you continue to demonstrate the lack of clue I have seen to this point I will rethink my position. You do not need to post replies to my user talk, I am watching this page. If, after reading Harassment, you have questions or need clarification, post your concerns here.  Tide  rolls  13:44, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Cola actually supports that Sabra-Shatila can remain in the Genocides article: Sabra and Shatila has a decent source that describes it as "genocide"; your effort doesn't. Hence Sabra-Shatila can stay on the article, whilst your suggestion has to vanish.ColaXtra (talk) 01:41, 21 October 2012 (UTC). Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 14:38, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or  located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 12:50, 21 October 2012 (UTC)