User talk:Sb205

Minor edits
Please remember to mark your edits as minor if (and only if) they genuinely are minor edits (see Help:Minor edit). Marking a major change as a minor one is considered poor etiquette. The rule of thumb is that only an edit that consists solely of spelling corrections, formatting changes, or rearranging of text without modifying content should be flagged as a 'minor edit.'  Hiding your non-minor edits away behind a "minor" mark makes it more difficult to review an article's history, and doesn't do your very good and informative corrections, updates, and additions justice! --Icarus (Hi!) 09:42, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Image permission problem with Image:Simon Baron-Cohen 2008 licenced for use.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Simon Baron-Cohen 2008 licenced for use.jpg I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the image's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 20:01, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Disagreement regarding Sally-anne test
Regarding your removal of 'confusing' criticism, I did not find the criticism confusing, and actually found the article remarkable solely because of this criticism. The section I thought was clear and quite useful read " Strictly speaking, the scenario presented in the test does not give sufficient information to determine Sally's expectations about the location of the marble. For example, it is not said whether Sally and Anne had previously discussed possible locations for the marble. Thus "I don't know" is, in a sense, the most correct answer. " You have replaced it with " The test uses dolls as representations of people so a 'failure' on the test could reflect a failure to treat dolls as people. The replication by Frith and Leslie using real people instead of dolls (obtaining very similar results) suggests this criticism is not a major concern. " I do not think the problem is with the treatment of the dolls as people, but with the assumption that sally and anne did not communicate. And nuts to the fool who eliminated the criticism section altogether >:[ Criticisms of the Sally-anne test are hardly off topic for the article "Sally-anne test" 76.228.246.68 (talk) 01:58, 30 November 2009 (UTC)