User talk:Sbake37/sandbox

Evaluating an article
You've chosen some promising articles, but I don't see an evaluation. Please pick your top choice and evaluate it using the instructions in the exercise posted on the dashboard. Josef Horáček (talk) 20:07, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

Final Assessment

 * You worked on three different articles rather than choosing just one as you were asked to do. Your contributions are of varying quality, but overall you made a positive contribution to Wikipedia.
 * "Nanotechnology for water purification": Excellent edits, and a good source. You left a stray period at the beginning of the article.
 * "Water in Sudan": This edit rephrased the sentence but didn't really improve it, plus you ended the sentence with a comma rather than a period.
 * "Watermaker": A useful contribution, but once again, you made some basic mechanical errors. Josef Horáček (talk) 18:54, 26 April 2019 (UTC)