User talk:Sbb1413/Archives2020/April

"Behaviour of gases" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Behaviour of gases. Since you had some involvement with the Behaviour of gases redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Utopes (talk / cont) 19:00, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Méjicano


A tag has been placed on Méjicano requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. signed,Rosguill talk 20:25, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ainstain


A tag has been placed on Ainstain requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. signed,Rosguill talk 20:41, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mexicanx


A tag has been placed on Mexicanx requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 January 13. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. -KAP03 (Talk &#x2022;&#x20;Contributions &#x2022;&#x20;Email) 03:24, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

"Francais phonetique" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Francais phonetique. Since you had some involvement with the Francais phonetique redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. signed,Rosguill talk 17:37, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

Disruptive editing
Please stop creating redirects for the foreseeable future, until you understand Wikipedia policy and guidelines concerning redirects. Your revision history is packed full of Rfd discussion notices, and with previous complaints about numerous questionable redirects you have created. This is becoming disruptive of other editors' time. If someone raises an issue about your behavior at the Administrator's noticeboard, I would seriously consider voting in favor of having you blocked for disruption. The easiest way for you to forestall any administrator action that might restrict your editing privileges, is to simply stop your disruptive redirects now, and move on to something else. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 02:31, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
 * , Soumya has already been served a topic ban at ANI . From looking at their contributions on xtools, I don't see any redirects created since the ban was passed (I'm inclined to look the other way on two redirects inadvertently created as a result of moves), so I think that this further warning is unnecessary. signed,Rosguill talk 02:37, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
 * , thanks, I missed that. Collapsing. Mathglot (talk) 02:44, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Accueil


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Accueil requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Zaxxon0 (talk) 10:05, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

SPOC request
Hello! Thanks for your help here and for updating the ULA article. In case you did not see my reply, I was curious what you thought about adding "Rail tracks connect SPOC to the Vertical Integration Facility and SLC-41 pad for Vulcan ops" or similar language to help readers understand how everything's connected. I'll let you and other editors decide, but just wanted to make sure you saw my note. Thanks again! ULA Megan (talk) 17:05, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Accueil


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Accueil requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Amkgp (talk) 18:20, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Soumya, redirects to wiktionary are not exempt from the ban on creating redirects. I've nominated this particular one for deletion, see the RfD discussion. – Uanfala (talk) 23:47, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
 * I'll ask the admin who placed the topic ban,, to weigh in on this violation and determine if further action is necessary. -- Tavix ( talk ) 18:07, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
 * While technically Wiktionary soft redirects are counted as articles, based on the linked RFD most people still consider them to be redirects; I would say they do fall under the "no redirects" restriction. Given this is a bit of a grey area I won't impose any sanctions, but please don't do it again. Primefac (talk) 18:46, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Request
Hi there! I just need to request you that please add 2nd nomination of miscellany for deletion for User talk:My password is poopy and this time also add the reason as someone's insane text and a stupid record of a user who was not here to contribute. Thanks. 122.161.242.254 (talk) 04:35, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
 * The result of the 1st nomination was:


 * --Soumyabrata stay at home wash your hands to protect from coronavirus 05:44, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Continuation of "Request"
So then add more details in the second miscellany for deletion nomination. That page User talk:My password is poopy needs to get deleted as a stupid record of a user who is not here to contribute and someone's insane text. Also add the criteria of speedy deletion G6 WP:DENY. 122.161.82.71 (talk) 07:16, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

April 2020
Why are you moving articles against consensus? At Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Languages "The result of the move request was: Not moved. Consensus is that present titles are clearer." Yet you have unilaterally moved them. Toddy1 (talk) 05:08, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

I have reverted your edits to Requested moves/Technical requests 04:51-05:06, 20 April 2020. Your proposed moves are against consensus see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Languages. I am astonished that you listed these as "Uncontroversial technical requests". Toddy1 (talk) 05:48, 20 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Toddy, I concur. And thanks for completing the reverts. I had to stop editing for awhile, and when I came back to finish up, you had already done them. - BilCat (talk) 06:27, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Chandrayaan-2
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Chandrayaan-2 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 09:40, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Madhukar Gogate for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Madhukar Gogate is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Madhukar Gogate until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Reyk YO! 11:38, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Chandrayaan-2
The article Chandrayaan-2 you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Chandrayaan-2 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 16:40, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Shuttle-derived vehicle


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Shuttle-derived vehicle. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Shuttle-Derived_Vehicle. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Shuttle-Derived_Vehicle. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Sir Joseph (talk) 14:29, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

April 2020
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

I noticed your recent edit to Wikipedia:Article titles does not have an edit summary.&#32;Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. ''Could you please clarify, why you've replaced Template:Redirect-for with Template:Redirect-distinguish on all those pages in the project namespace? Special:Diff/953450164, Special:Diff/953450230, Special:Diff/953450355, Special:Diff/953450426, etc.'' —⁠andrybak (talk) 09:26, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
 * I've just remembered that I already left such a warning before. At it is one among many others: one, two, three, four, five (just from the talk page archives). —⁠andrybak (talk) 09:36, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Adding my voice to the choir. This encyclopedia is a collaborative project. Eric talk 13:28, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Yes, I agree with that^ - because it would tell us more about why you are making certain changes. Some of your edits in "World Languages" have been with items which I personally inserted, and it would be helpful and illuminating to know what exactly your reasoning is. In addition, have you ever considered coming in to the article's Talk-File to explain beforehand what you think should be added [or subtracted] from the main article? > thereby inviting other editors to comment and to make alternative suggestions? --DLMcN (talk) 12:07, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

About that signature...
As discussed at WP:SIG, signatures that are formatted to be excessively long and/or distracting are discouraged. Can you please consider changing yours? Thanks! VQuakr (talk) 17:39, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Motion seconded... Eric talk 17:45, 29 April 2020 (UTC)


 * What about this? --Soumyabrata talk contribs subpages 04:46, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you! VQuakr (talk) 09:52, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

Cape Canaveral Space Force Station
I wanted to notify you about a requested move on Cape Canaveral Space Force Station, since you were involved in the first one. Talk:Cape Canaveral Space Force Station Garuda28 (talk) 03:51, 30 April 2020 (UTC)