User talk:Sbldnttt

Welcome!
Hello, Sbldnttt, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! JohnCD (talk)

Draft:SANG BLEU
This would not be acceptable in its present state. Read WP:Your first article for advice. JohnCD (talk) 19:37, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
 * It's too promotional. "highly influential... recognized worldwide... most innovative... top level... High profile... " That is PR-speak, and those glowing adjectives are "peacock terms" - unsupported adjectives of praise. That is not what an encyclopedia is for: Wikipedia requires a neutral point of view - no opinions, no glowing adjectives, just plain facts, cited to reliable sources. An article that seems to be trying to sell its subject will not be accepted. It should not be the story the company wants to tell the world, but an outside view, the things a general encyclopedia reader might want to know
 * It needs references to reliable sources, for two reasons: the Verifiability policy that "any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable, published source", and the Notability test for inclusion, which looks for references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." Significant means more than just listing-type mentions; reliable excludes Youtube, Facebook, blogs, places where anyone can post anything; independent excludes the subject's own website, affiliated ones and anything based on press releases. The test is, have people not connected with the subject thought it significant enough to write substantial comment about? See also Notability (summary).

Conflict of interest?
If you are connected with or employed by Sang Bleu, you should read Conflict of interest and the Plain and simple conflict of interest guide. You will see that you should not edit directly about the company, but may submit a draft for review, and that you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use ("Paid contributions without disclosure" under section 4), and in some jurisdictions by laws against covert advertising, to disclose your interest in any edits where you have a COI. JohnCD (talk) 19:37, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

May 2016
Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy or request a change of username. You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose. If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text at the bottom of your talk page. You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text at the bottom of your talk page. Thank you. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  03:19, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
 * I have no problem unblocking you if you choose a new username, however this current username goes against guidelines since it's the same handle that the business goes by on social media. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  03:20, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:SANG BLEU


Hello, Sbldnttt. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "SANG BLEU".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the  or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 00:16, 12 January 2017 (UTC)