User talk:Sbowde2/sandbox

Group 24 Doing the Review
Review #1

Oooohhh, a pic would be a great addition to your ChemBox ;)

It seems redundant to have a section in which the Chembox info is repeated.

In your Uses and Safety sections you have a lot of facts but only talk about each for a sentence. To beef up the page try expanding on all those fragments, (The compound reacts violently with water., If the compound comes into contact with damp air, it may lead to the heating and ignition of the solid powder., Can also cause severe skin burns, etc. ) just a thought.

Love the Reactions diagram!

All taken together, the page looks great.

Rob

Rob Madsen (talk) 05:07, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Review #2

First, I think that you would benefit from a general overview under the title of your page like all Wikipedia pages have on them.

I also think that it is a bit unnecessary to repeat your ChemBox information because people already have that formation in the box. Instead maybe talk about how that information is useful to the actual compound or how the information is unique to that molecule. You could even possibly talk about how that information was found. Such facts can be easily found using scifinder.org.

I really like the picture of your reaction. I think that this will benefit people looking at the page and wondering how this molecule reacts with other things.

Overall, I think it would be useful if you expanded upon your sections and find more information on them. In addition, I think it would be beneficial to link the terms to other Wikipedia pages for reference so people can understand all the information that is being presented to them. I think you did a great job overall!

Stefanie

Ronge2 (talk) 08:28, 1 November 2012 (UTC)