User talk:Sbuett/Sector collapse

Cecilia's Peer Review
Lead Section: Your lead section is great! Everything is super clear, and it's well-organized. Would it be possible for you to explain "volcanic edifice"? That was the only part that was unclear for me (I figure you would've wikilinked it if a wikipedia page for that existed). The lead gives a good summary of everything that will be discussed in the article. I like that you briefly mentioned causes and consequences, and then you gave those both sections in your article.

Structure: I think your article structure is great. I like that you put "Causes" before "Consequences," so that the article is in chronological order. I also appreciate that you included a section on examples and how you formatted that section.

Coverage: The coverage in this article makes sense to me. If you wanted to add something, you could do more for the "Examples" section. Maybe "Important Examples" and describe a few of them? And then add a section called "Other Examples" and just list the rest. This is really small, but I noticed that you made a typo/the sentence is a little repetitive in the second sentence of the "Consequences" section.

Neutral content: Your tone is very neutral. I didn't notice any points in the article where you seemed biased.

References: All of your sources look good, except maybe the 4th one. I couldn't find where you used it in your article (but I might have just missed it). All of the statements have a source to back them up.

Good job on your article!

Cguterman6 (talk) 19:07, 31 March 2023 (UTC)