User talk:Scani

Deal or No Deal Canada
Can you take more screens of it?--WestJet 22:14, 11 February 2007 (UTC) {Replied --Scani 04:40, 12 February 2007 (UTC)}
 * Models, the differance in the USA case and Canadian case, the phone. --WestJet 21:56, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Howie's Cowboy Hat...
By any chance do you have a screen of Howie in his cowboy hat? I want this picture! --WestJet 22:47, 2 March 2007 (UTC) {Replied --Scani 15:56, 5 March 2007 (UTC)}

Bypasses
I was looking at the transportation map from the city's most recent official plan, which has "proposed" ramps in both the southwest and northeast corners. I suppose the MTO might have different ideas than the city does, but that's what my source was. Bearcat 00:26, 10 April 2007 (UTC)


 * No problems. I found the map fascinating; some of the proposed roads are hilarious. (If they want a road from Laurentian to Lo-Ellen, why don't they just widen the bikepath that already goes from the athletic facilities to Loach's instead of building that silly thing? And what's with the Maley-Notre Dame interchange?) And thanks to you too...I didn't even know they had a web page up for the bypass project. Bearcat 03:04, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Furry


Walden, etc.
It was a matter of stub reduction — it's honestly better to have six longer articles about the various communities in the city rather than 40 or 50 three-line stubs that didn't have any actual references and mostly couldn't ever be expanded much beyond their existing length. There was also a request on the main city article's talk page to expand the Walden/Valley East/Rayside-Balfour, etc., articles. Bearcat (talk) 21:50, 29 November 2007 (UTC)


 * I've already whittled down some of the old-city neighbourhoods where I could — Robinson + Lockerby + Lo-Ellen = South End (would McFarlane Lake go there too, or is it generally considered a separate thing?), Barrydowne, Lebel and Nickeldale into New Sudbury, etc. But there were also some where I wasn't sure of the best way to proceed — there aren't any immediately obvious merge targets for things like Donovan or Gatchell or Copper Cliff. Bearcat (talk) 22:03, 29 November 2007 (UTC)


 * I should mention that in this particular circumstance, I don't think merging them all into one stub article at the title "Sudbury, Ontario" would be the best solution, because a lot of people still don't understand how the government structure has changed, and would just blindly link to the old title as if it were the article on the current city. An alternative title would be suitable (maybe repurpose the existing List of communities in Greater Sudbury?), but for now I still think the Sudbury, Ontario title should be left as a redirect. Bearcat (talk) 22:11, 29 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Heh, almost finished doing exactly that — especially since merging all the community articles up to the old municipalities basically made the list redundant anyway. However, I've opted to move the list to the new title Urban neighbourhoods of Sudbury since that's a more accurate reflection of what it now contains, and also gets it as close to the naming format of the other articles as possible without actually tripping over the redirect issue. I'm in the process of fixing the redirects now. Bearcat (talk) 00:23, 30 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The only question left now is Wanup, since it was a new annexation that wasn't part of any incorporated municipality prior to 2001. At the same time, though, it looks kind of odd for Wanup to be the only community-level part of the city that has its own article instead of being merged into one of the omnibus articles. What do you think — should we leave it as a standalone article, or should we cheat and merge it into one of the municipal lists anyway? Bearcat (talk) 00:37, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:DonD Canada Set.JPG
 Thanks for uploading File:DonD Canada Set.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 07:29, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Scani! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:07, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Mélanie Turgeon -

Orphaned non-free media (File:DonD Canada Models.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:DonD Canada Models.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 05:07, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:DonD Canada Reveal.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:DonD Canada Reveal.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 05:08, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:DonD Canada Banker.JPG)
Thanks for uploading File:DonD Canada Banker.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 05:08, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

RfC: New helper policy
Hello member of ! You are invited to join an ongoing discussion on Wikipedia talk:IRC/wikipedia-en-help aimed at defining a policy for prerequisites to being a helper in the "" channel in a section titled "New helper policy".

To prevent future mailings about IRC, you may remove your user page from. Assistance is available upon request if you can't figure out where it is being added to your user page. This message has been sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:59, 27 April 2015 (UTC) on behalf of —

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC)