User talk:ScarTissueBloodBlister

Speedy deletion of "We, The Undersigned (2007)"
A page you created, We, The Undersigned (2007), has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a real person, group of people, band, club, company, organisation, or web content, but does not indicate why its subject is important or significant.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. TylerPuetz (talk/contribs) 23:30, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of We, the Undersigned
A tag has been placed on We, the Undersigned requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Paranormal Skeptic (talk) 23:31, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Theo & the Skyscrapers
A tag has been placed on Theo & the Skyscrapers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Paranormal Skeptic (talk) 00:24, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Theo & the Skyscrapers
On reflection, I agree with you and have undeleted it. Should anyone else try to delete it, the piece of Wikipedia policy you need to be quoting is A musician or ensemble is notable if it contains at least one member who was once a part of or later joined a band that is otherwise notable, which clearly applies here. –  iride scent  00:48, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, I'm new at this..

So Many Ways To Die
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of So Many Ways To Die, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.audiolunchbox.com/album?a=158996. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 05:12, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Hello and Welcome!
Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! --Grrrlriot (♠ ♣ ♦ ♥ †) 21:32, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

By the way, I am liking your edits. :) --Grrrlriot (♠ ♣ ♦ ♥ †) 21:32, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Retching Red & The Twats
I have nominated Retching Red & The Twats, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Retching Red & The Twats. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.  Ṝέđ ṃάяķvюĨїήīṣŢ  Drop me a line''' 16:42, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Retching Red
A tag has been placed on Retching Red requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 17:10, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Theo & the Skyscrapers
I have nominated Theo & the Skyscrapers, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Theo & the Skyscrapers. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 17:16, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

A musician or ensemble is notable if it contains at least one member who was once a part of or later joined a band that is otherwise notable (Taken from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:BAND )

ScarTissueBloodBlister (talk) 22:45, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

Retching Red's disappearence
I think the original article got speedy deleted while you were editing it. So when you clicked 'Save' you basically created a new empty version of the article, or something like that. I suggest you contact one of the admins at CAT:RESTORE. They can send you your text. You can then edit it, maybe off-wiki, and upload it again once the article is completely finished. If I can help, let me know.   SIS   00:02, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, I've contacted someone about it. ScarTissueBloodBlister (talk) 02:33, 1 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Have replied on my talkpage. –  iride scent  02:34, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Theo & the Skyscrapers
"The singer Theo Kogan was in a very important riot grrl band called the Lunachicks. Her husband who is also in the band is a member of the Toilet Böys. So there are two members of the band who have been important in music history and continue to be today. The article should not be deleted." Then why didn't you put that in the article? In its current condition, that article has no assertation of notability besides having members of other notable bands. Could you please put a little more info into new articles when you make them, or at least a reference? You might also want to read WP:1S. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 00:09, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Deletion review
I have posted a question at Deletion review which you may be able to answer. Can you please return to that discussion to answer it? Stifle (talk) 08:21, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Retching Red is back
I've started a new version of the article. You're more than welcome to add to it.   SIS   00:09, 2 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Awesome! Thanks! :) ScarTissueBloodBlister (talk) 02:05, 2 October 2008 (UTC)


 * I removed two of the links you added. MySpace and commercial links are not wanted on WP. See WP:EL for details.   SIS   02:34, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

K, sorry, didn't realize that. ScarTissueBloodBlister (talk) 02:35, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:SMTD1theo.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:SMTD1theo.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 06:39, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

You are adding a lot of flag icons
While I do like the sentiment (proud Canadian that I am), we don't usually use flags in infoboxes in this way. Manual of Style (icons) asks us not to use them for decorative purposes. Or perhaps I am misunderstanding your reasons for adding them...? Thanks, Paul Erik  (talk) (contribs) 05:51, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

I saw them on some other wiki band pages so I thought it was normal..sorry. ScarTissueBloodBlister (talk)


 * No big deal. Paul Erik  (talk) (contribs) 05:56, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

Notability of Bulimia Banquet
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Bulimia Banquet, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Bulimia Banquet seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Bulimia Banquet, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 22:10, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Bulimia Banquet
I have nominated Bulimia Banquet, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Bulimia Banquet. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Gmatsuda (talk) 03:18, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Cinder Block
Hi. Great work on the Cinder Block article! I've added a photo.   SIS   14:16, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

Awesome, thanks! ScarTissueBloodBlister (talk)

Reply
Heavy metal gets very hazy post 1979. Many heavy metal subgenres already have a list of their own. Many have already been AfD'd as useless because they could be easily replaced by a category. (even the list of punk bands could be replaced by a category) That's why the list has the format that it does right now. It is simply a bridge between the main heavy metal music article and the countless "list ofs" that come under it. It is meant as a helper resource for overflow content from the main genre page... not to be some sort of extensive list that ignores the sub-genres. If it were it would be useless (see category) or... it would make all the others useless. "List of X genres" should always look like the list of thrash metal bands page or else they risk being quickly AfD'd because they are unnecessary. Hope that helps. The Real Libs-speak politely 20:11, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

Punk template
Is there a consensus to add this to all these punk articles? --John (talk) 04:00, 25 December 2008 (UTC) I assume so from what it says on this page under 'templates' : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Punk_music ScarTissueBloodBlister (talk) 04:05, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

When you add a new banner to a page would you also copy any "|listas=" value into the new banner? The listas parameter defines how a page is sorted in a list. If it is not used at all Daryl Palumbo is listed under D. The line "|listas=Palumbo, Daryl" puts the page under P, where most people would look for it.

Thank you.
 * JimCubb (talk) 16:33, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

I'll try to keep that in mind.. ScarTissueBloodBlister (talk) 04:37, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. Most of the articles should already be in WPBiog so you can probably copy the listas from there. If not, the format should be LastName, FirstName "Nickname".

Thanks again.
 * JimCubb (talk) 17:33, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Mark spicoluk.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Mark spicoluk.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 03:06, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Deletion of Oppressed Logic
Have a look at Notability (music). Deb (talk) 17:21, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I checked out the references, but none of them were independent - they were all advertising material for the band. Deb (talk) 19:40, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm glad you pointed out Creepy to me because they are clearly non-notable and merit speedy deletion if some references don't appear pretty quickly. I will restore Oppressed Logic at your request, but the same goes for that article. Deb (talk) 19:55, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Bunchofuckingoofs
Please do not make personal attacks. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ←Signed:→ Mr. E. Sánchez Get to know me! / Talk to me! ←at≈:→ 19:50, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Edit summaries
Use them please! Johnbod (talk) 04:40, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of New Romance for Kids
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article New Romance for Kids, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * This article is not notable enough for WP:MUSIC, is of low quality, and has no reliable sources.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. — Jeff G. (talk&#124;contribs) 21:45, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

Galactus Edit War Mediation
Hi. I'm trying to mediate an edit war over the Galactus article here. Can you chime in with your two cents? Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 23:59, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Deranged Records
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Deranged Records, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.ebullition.com/Xderanged.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 06:44, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

All set. Thanks for asking. :) --PMDrive1061 (talk) 06:57, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Deranged Records
A tag has been placed on Deranged Records requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. t'shael mindmeld 06:57, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

I've added authorship for the songs in the Sewn Mouth Secrets article
Hey, could you please reassess the Sewn Mouth Secrets article? Now it meets the requirements for C-class at least. Thanks Gothbag (talk) 17:40, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Done and done. ScarTissueBloodBlister (talk) 22:03, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Re:WikiProject Body Modification
-- <em style="font-family:Kristen ITC;color:#ff0000"> Tinu  <em style="font-family:Kristen ITC;color:#ff0000">Cherian  - 08:25, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of tattoo artists


The article List of tattoo artists has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * This is an indiscriminate list. There is not a clear definition of what the list entails.   What is a notable tattoo artist?

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. A new name 2008 (talk) 23:20, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Google image search
I quite agree and have removed the VA template. Feel free yourself.  Ty  12:38, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

Primary use of nose ring
There is a discussion Talk:Nose ring (animals)#Requested move about the primary use of a nose ring. Is it the one for humans or animals. If you would like to express an opinion, feel free to join the discussion. Vegaswikian (talk) 21:11, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

Could you help me stop Lesser Of Two and Embers (band) from being deleted.
Hi, I saw that you were involved in editing the Hiretsukan band page. I created the Lesser Of Two and Embers (band) page. Lesser Of Two played with Hiretsukan at one point and I thought that since they were bands playing in the same circles that you could help me prevent the site from being deleted either through your involvement or advice in this process. I am a new wikipedia contributor.

Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Noodlesteve (talk • contribs) 02:53, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I'll do what I can to help. ScarTissueBloodBlister (talk) 02:57, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Embers AfD
Hey- responded to your comments on the Embers AfD. I see what you're saying, I would just suggest you take a look at what the references actually are and look at the relevant notability standards and see if you think the references actually support notability, which is the basis on which the AfD is founded. To be frank, I'm uncomfortable with having AfD'd what is a good looking, well Wiki'd new article, written likely in good faith. When the article failed CSD (rightly), I was very tempted to just drop the issue but it felt disingenuous to have read the article, looked at the references, seen what, to me, was a clearly non-notable topic, at least as far as the extant standards are concerned, and -not- nominated it for AfD. Anyway, was just wondering if you had additional comments/thoughts based on the notability standards as they apply to the references. Obviously, there are a good number of references in the article, but references to Myspace, blogs, other band sites, and a basically unrelated film don't really apply (and could be arguably redacted in and of themselves as unreliable sources) to notability. The Decibel article is the one catch in this but as far as I can tell the article either doesn't exist or is misleadingly described -- Decibel posts their review coverage online, as far as I can tell, and there are no real reviews of Embers. If someone could find evidence of the review's existence it would go a long way towards establishing notability (although arguably not quite all the way). <font color=#AAAAFF>ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡ <font color=#D50000>bomb 05:27, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Well I guess you're right. Besides the Decibel ref this is the only other relevant and reliable reference http://www.profaneexistence.org/reviews?start=320 The Maximum Rock n Roll reference could be good as well, it's hard to say. ScarTissueBloodBlister (talk) 15:30, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Lesser Of Two
Thank you very much for your recent edits helping clear up the page and including Lesser Of Two in the punk rock portal. I still have a long way to go to clean up the article. I didn't know exactly what I was getting myself into at first, but I am committed to finishing what I started. Regarding the plagiarism comment, the text in question was used with the permission of it's author. You can feel free to contact the myspace page. Also, should we add the punk rock portal to the entry itself, and if so how? Again, thank you.javascript:insertTags('noodle 03:06, 7 February 2010 (UTC)',,) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Noodlesteve (talk • contribs) No problem. I think you need some way to prove you have permission to use the author's words. You'd have to ask someone else, an admin maybe, on what to do exactly in that situation because I;m not really sure. No don't add the punk rock portal to the entry, that's not normally done and will most likely be removed. Also, just so you know, you can't use myspace sites, blogs, or official band sites as references. If there's anything else I can do to help let me know. ScarTissueBloodBlister (talk) 03:43, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I appreciate the info. I do question one thing concerning myspace, and blogs, and other self published sources. As I stated on the Lesser of Two talk page these sources are not "reliable" under wikipedia standards but I do think they are "verifiable" under the selfpub exceptions in that they are not self promoting, contentious, or speaking on a matter that is in dispute. These references are of bands stating that they played a particular show with Lesser of Two. It appears it falls under the verifiability exception. If I'm misunderstading please explain, but I do not think that wikipedia has a complete ban on use of myspace and blogs as sources. Rather the usage seems limited to particular purposes which I believe is acceptable in the previous form. Except of course the myspace and blogs of Lesser of Two themselves. I do agree with your decision to delete there. I think we should restore the majority of third party blogs and myspace under the selfpub exception as stated in the talk page. Thanks.noodle 09:41, 8 February 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Noodlesteve (talk • contribs)
 * Ask an admin just to be sure. Here are a list of the administrators: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Wikipedia_administrators ScarTissueBloodBlister (talk) 16:37, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

Now they're out to get Lesser of Two
Hey, thank you for letting me know people were trying to delete my entry Embers (band). It would have been nice if the AfD nominator would have told me. Well now the AfD has spilled over to Articles for deletion/Lesser of Two. Now, I could see a credible argument for AfD discussion of Embers, but Lesser of Two is a band with many more references and accomplishments. Please help. Thanks. noodle 03:06, 12 February 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Noodlesteve (talk • contribs)
 * K I will try. ScarTissueBloodBlister (talk) 21:52, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Just for the record, I notified Noodle about the Embers AfD the instant I submitted it. His comment up there is a blatant fabrication. My post is still on his talk page, in fact. Not cool. <font color=#AAAAFF>ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡ <font color=#D50000>bomb 00:43, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Ballast (band) and Look Back and Laugh
I thought you might be interested in helping improve these pages I recently authored. Thank you.noodle 03:40, 25 February 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Noodlesteve (talk • contribs)
 * Haha yeah, I just started working on Ballast, thanks. ScarTissueBloodBlister (talk) 03:44, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Did I beat you to it or something...That's weird. Nice research too. Thank you.noodle 03:29, 26 February 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Noodlesteve (talk • contribs)

Portal:Body Modification
Hi ScarTissueBloodBlister, i'm working on the german de:Portal:Body Modification. Since June 2008 we select a monthly picture to present it on the portal. All of them are listet in the archive or in the commons category. If you want to, you can join the monthly discussions about the next pictures and we can do an interwiki picture selection. The selected picture than can be presented on both, the english and the german portal. Actually we are always just two persons and i think would be nice if you would like to join us. --Nicor (talk) 22:05, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

List of tattoo artists
Hi there, I wondered if you'd like to give your opinion at Talk:List of tattoo artists on the scope of the list/who should be included. I posted a note at the Wikiproject page but I'm not sure how may people watch it! -- Beloved Freak  11:18, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

Message from WikiProject Punk music
You are receving this because your user name is listed in Category:WikiProject Punk music members or on our participants list. If you would like to stop these sorts of updates please remove the userbox from your profile and move your name down to the Inactive/former members section of the participants list. Cheers

--Guerillero &#124; My Talk   02:17, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jinxi Boo


A tag has been placed on Jinxi Boo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 23:23, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

We're recruiting art lovers!
p.s. I love Hole! SarahStierch (talk) 03:31, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Come hang out with us!
Hi! I wanted to let you know that we have created an IRC channel for "countering systemic bias one new editor at a time", aka closing the gender gap! Come hang out at #wikimedia-gendergap. We hope this channel can serve as a safe haven to hang out, talk about Wiki, brainstorming, women in Wikimedia, article alerts and foster friendships. I hope you join us! (And if you need any IRC help, just let me know!) See you there! SarahStierch (talk) 02:29, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Gauntlet (body piercing)


A tag has been placed on Gauntlet (body piercing) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 03:52, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Project Punk Newsletter: February 2012 (Volume III, Issue I)
Delivered by In actu (Guerillero) on behalf of WikiProject Punk. You are receiving this because your user name is listed in Category:WikiProject Punk music members or on our participants list. If you would like to stop these sorts of updates please remove the userbox from your profile, remove the category from your profile, and/or move your name down to the Inactive/former members section of the participants list. Thanks.

16:30, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

this is extremely random and you don't know me but you seem cool... Violetcries

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

New 10,000 Challenge for Canada
Hi, WikiProject Canada/The 10,000 Challenge is up and running based on The 10,000 Challenge for the UK which has currently produced over 2300 article improvements and creations. If you'd like to see large scale quality improvements happening for Canada like The Africa Destubathon, which has produced over 1600 articles in 5 weeks, sign up on the page. The idea will be an ongoing national editathon/challenge for Canada but fuelled by a contest such as The North America Destubathon to really get articles on every province and subject mass improved. I would like some support from Canadian wikipedians here to get the Challenge off to a start with some articles to make doing a Destubathon worthwhile! Cheers. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Canadian punk rock for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Canadian punk rock is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Canadian punk rock until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  ~SML  •  TP  21:32, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Portal:Body modification
Portal:Body modification, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Body modification and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Body modification during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:21, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Contrived
An article you created has been nominated for deletion due to WP:GNG and lack of reliable sources concerns. Feel free to discuss the article on it's AfD page Articles for deletion/Contrived, but please do not remove the AfD template from the top of the page.Hog Farm (talk) 04:35, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

Help with Ethel Granger
Hello ScarTissueBloodBlister, i maintain the portal Body_Modification in the German Wikipedia. Occasionally I also edit on the english wikipedia and write missing articles. Unfortunately my english is not that good. Could you check and correct Ethel Granger.

Best Regards --Doc.Heintz (talk) 08:23, 23 January 2020 (UTC) Portal:Body_Modification

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 29 November 2022 (UTC)