User talk:Scarajason

Except WMSCI many fake papers appeared recently in several IEEE conferences, because the IEEE grants its name and its logo to many local organizers that without any review process http://iaria-highsci.blogspot.com/, without reading any of the submitted papers http://anti-ieee.blogspot.com/. It is being argued that such conferences only exist to make money out of researchers that are looking for a simple way to publish their work http://bogus-conferences.blogspot.com Suddenly new publishers appeared like IARIA, http://www.iaria.org and HIGHSCI http://www.highsci.org. As seen from their web sites, IARIA and HIGHSCI use the name of IEEE and the IEEE publishing services, thus attracting numerous papers. Some people to test some conference go further and sent the paper "A Statistical Method For Women That Can Help Our Sexual Education" in the IEEE Conference organized by IARIA. This paper receive automatical acceptance within a few hours with simultaneus "command" of direct payment. Unfortunately this paper was not published because the authors did not pay the registration fee. However the letter of acceptance is published on the web and anybody can check it: http://iaria-highsci.blogspot.com/,  http://scamieee.blogspot.com/

Other protest blogs are:
 * Official Protests.
 * Bogus Conferences.


 * "Netdriver".
 * "Another Letter of acceptance in an IEEE Conference".
 * Anti-Plagiarism Web Log.

May 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page International Association of Science and Technology for Development has been reverted. Your edit here to International Association of Science and Technology for Development was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://netdriver.blogspot.com/2009/01/from-site-httpwwwanti-plagiarismorg.html) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 15:02, 30 May 2015 (UTC)