User talk:Scarice

Scarice: While your article Eria is extensive, I am concerned that it fails the notability guidelines established here. Namely, the subject of the article is a role-playing character, and as such is implicitly not scientific, and therefore not worthy of inclusion in the project. I wish you good luck in your edits, and good times on the message board. I also invite you to discuss this matter with me on my talk page if you have any further questions. --HubHikari 22:57, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Your edits to Eria
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Scarice! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but please note that the link you added in is on my spam blacklist and should not be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an Imageshack or Photobucket image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was genuine spam, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 02:18, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Tiraka
The article Tiraka, like the article Eria, fails notability guidelines because it concerns a non-notable group. In addition, your self-reference in the article is non-encyclopedic in manner, and your copyright notice is legally null; by submitting content to the project under the GFDL, you released all rights to same and essentially declared "This article is public property; anybody may do what they will to this page." Please review the guidelines for notability before submitting articles, and feel free to discuss this with me in a civil manner on my talk page should you have any questions. --HubHikari 03:22, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Tiraka
A tag has been placed on Tiraka, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because it is an article about a certain web site, blog, forum, or other community of web users that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template  to the page, and put a note on Talk:Tiraka. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. MidgleyDJ 06:14, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Regarding your edit to Tiraka:
Your recent edit to Tiraka (diff) was reverted by automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either vandalism, link spam, or test edits to the page. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. Thanks! // VoABot II 06:53, 26 January 2007 (UTC)