User talk:Scarmitage

April 2010
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Daryl Gates. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The sources say "beating", sorry you can't change history by editing it out of Wikipedia.  Thundermaker (talk) 14:28, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

If history would have deemed the use of force against Rodney King a beating, the LAPD Officers would not have been acquitted and exonerated of all criminal charges in a court of law. You my friend, do not get to play history major and state incorrect facts about history, nor do you get to slander the finest Police Department in the world. If you would like to continue in your efforts, you may very quickly find yourself in the very some courthouse as those LAPD Officers, just a little farther down the hall in the Civil courtroom. Facts of history do not come from the media, they are established by case laws, actually events and the Judicial system in general. Have a great day and check back soon to see that I have once again updated the article correctly.


 * It's OK if you don't recognize the difference between historical truth and reasonable doubt, or a good police department vs. one that provokes riots, but please don't make WP:legal threats on Wikipedia. Thundermaker (talk) 16:36, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

May 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.--78.128.178.195 (talk) 03:38, 5 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Please use the article talk page, talk:Daryl Gates, to explain your issues with the content. Deleting an entire section of sourced material isn't a good solution.   Will Beback    talk    04:10, 5 May 2010 (UTC)