User talk:Scenesdream

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Mean as custard (talk) 14:15, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

February 2017
Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.  MrOllie (talk) 15:43, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Spam - a final warning
It seems your only interest in Wikipedia is promoting a spam site, which you've continued to do despite being reverted by a number of editors, despite the warnings above, and the warnings on your IP talk page User talk:213.61.95.74. While you're welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, as everyone is, if you continue to misuse Wikipedia for advertising, I or another administrator will block you from editing. -- Finlay McWalter··–·Talk 10:44, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

And don't do nonsense like this again. Just because you're upset that your link is removed doesn't give you any right to purge other links. That's just disrupting Wikipedia to prove a point. Look, tens of thousands of people, every day, manage to contribute constructively to Wikipedia - you have to decide whether you want to be one of them. -- Finlay McWalter··–·Talk 10:53, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

Man, you don't know what you are saying! I am expert in this field! if for you, my links are spam the others are as well! The link that I removed are from companies and software that you need to pay or sign up a service, there are not reasons you keep the links there, however, my links are for content with relevant information from an open and independent platform! Do what you want, but you are wrong it this case! Scenesdream (talk) 11:29, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
 * You may be an expert in your field, but you are not an expert in building an encyclopaedia, which is what we do here. Since your single purpose here seems to be to insert links to pages on the Visaya site, I can only assume that you are associated with this organisation in some way.  That puts you in a conflict of interest (COI) and means you are not in the best position to judge what should be in articles.  Please read the linked page and take to heart the advice on how conflicted editors should behave here, most especially if you are paid by Visaya or a product manufacturer.  I can't work out what Visaya's business model is, but it really doesn't matter, the advice is still the same to a COI editor. SpinningSpark 12:16, 27 June 2017 (UTC)