User talk:Schattentanz

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:17, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

Your user page
Hello. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, please do not add promotional material to articles or other Wikipedia pages, as you did to your userpage. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:17, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

Schattentanz, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!
 The Adventure

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi !  We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages

--

Please take a brief survey about The Wikipedia Adventure
Hi! Thanks for playing The Wikipedia Adventure, or at least considering it. We'd like to hear about your thoughts and feelings on the game, to help us improve it. Please take this brief survey: 10 minute survey.
 * --thanks and cheers, Ocaasi 20:18, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mohr im Hemd
Hello Schattentanz,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Mohr im Hemd for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Lemonmelonsuperstar (talk) 13:07, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Whack & Slaughter (December 30)
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [ Articles for creation help desk], or on the [ . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! A412  (Talk &bull; C) 18:12, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Whack & Slaughter (January 12)
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [ Articles for creation help desk], or on the [ . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Chris1834 (talk) 14:32, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Response for article review.
Most of the articles you referenced seem to have been around for nearly a decade. Unfortunately for you, Wikipedia has put in guidelines since that try to establish notability for an article before it is created so that the encyclopedia is not full of tiny articles that aren't useful to most people. I reviewed your three references: The 1st to are profile pages which are not very extensive and the third is a thread which is not even considered a valid source. If you could find one magazine/newspaper article (online or otherwise) that talks about it a little deeper than a profile page, you would probably be OK for references. I have gone through the 5 pages you sent me and marked them for improvement as well. As you can imagine, once these new rules come in to place, it can take a long time to bring everything up to this level (Especially when we are all volunteers and over 100 new articles asked to be approved every day). Chris1834 (talk) 22:46, 12 January 2014 (UTC)


 * OK for your three links you sent me...#1 (the thread): This falls under a user editable site, which means anyone can post to it and thus not reliable, #2 (video review) This is exactly what you need. It is a reliable source independent of the subject of your article with a review of the subject of your article, #3 (game rules) a simple posting of the games rules is not notable for reference (it could be a good external link however). As for external links: I don't even look at them when reviewing. We are looking for references and external links are completely different. Basically they should be things that are...if you would like more info on this subject type of things. That is why the rules of the game would make a good external link. I hope this helps you out. Chris1834 (talk) 15:30, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at AfC Whack & Slaughter was accepted
 Whack & Slaughter, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Chris1834 (talk) 13:28, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.