User talk:Sche422

Hi, Sarah!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Melissa Edwards (talk • contribs) 04:41, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Nice work!
Posted automatically via sandbox guided tour. Sarahchehab (talk) 00:40, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Sche422, you are invited to the Teahouse!
{| style="margin: 2em 4em;" Hi Sche422! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! (I'm a Teahouse host)  Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:32, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
 * - valign="top"
 * WP teahouse logo 2.png

Sarah
Hey Chica! See you in class!
 * }

Sarah
Hi Sarah! It's Jasmine from social psych class. I like your name on here. lol. My favorite color is pink and I love Shrimp Scampi. See you in assessment, tomorrow. :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lovejonespink (talk • contribs) 13:08, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Introducing myself
I work with the Wiki Education Foundation, and help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment. If there's anything I can do to help with your assignment (or, for that matter, any other aspect of Wikipedia) please feel free to drop me a note. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 15:36, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

Behavioural confirmation
Hello, I'm Bamyers99. An edit that you recently made to Behavioural confirmation seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! --Bamyers99 (talk) 01:01, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Feedback
Hi Sche422. Nice work expanding the Behavioural confirmation article. I just wanted to give you a few tips on how you could improve it further


 * The lead section could be a lot longer. It's supposed to be a summary of the entire article, including all the major points of it. As you expand other sections, you should try to condense them down to a sentence or two, and work that into the lead.
 * Bear in mind that you are writing for non-specialists, and you should try to write in plain English as much as possible. For example, a phrase like "previously unacquainted male-and female dyads" could be rephrased as "an unacquainted man and woman" or "an unacquainted male-female pair".
 * The Critique section uses a different reference style than the rest of the article, and sources that aren't among those listed. While I know you didn't add that section, puzzling out the full citations for the references in that section, and adding them to the article would improve the article nicely.
 * The Gruman and Ariganello (2002) reference includes the following link http://journals2.scholarsportal.info.myaccess.library.utoronto.ca/tmp/4113587650638266543.pdf Links that include "info.myaccess.library.utoronto.ca" are links through your library's proxy serve. These links are only accessible to people who are logged in through your library's website. As a result, they aren't very useful to anyone else. A direct link to the journal's homepage would be more helpful (although a complete reference, as you have already provided, is quite sufficient). Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 18:14, 13 July 2015 (UTC)