User talk:Schieler

February 2019
Hello, I'm Julietdeltalima. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the main body of Fictional universe of Harry Potter. Generally, any relevant external links should be listed in an "External links" section at the end of the article and meet the external links guidelines. Links within the body of an article should be internal Wikilinks. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  Julietdeltalima   (talk)  22:25, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Schieler Mew (February 15)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Schieler/sandbox/Schieler Mew and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Schieler/sandbox/Schieler Mew, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Schieler/sandbox/Schieler_Mew Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:KylieTastic&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Schieler/sandbox/Schieler_Mew reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 23:33, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from, SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:46, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

User:Schieler/sandbox/Schieler Mew


Hello, Schieler. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, User:Schieler/sandbox/Schieler Mew.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 00:41, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

https://s.steamyconcepts.com

 * Please remove your comment from my talk page as my Wikipedia changes are legitimate good-faith additions intended to verify article content and help build the encyclopedia. It is a time-accumulative service for me to go through and pro-actively update broken links, as 404's create bad user experiences. I do not appreciate your presuppositions and in the future would request that you learn to differentiate between SEO and creating a better Encyclopedia for all. Thank you.
 * Please remove your comment from my talk page as my Wikipedia changes are legitimate good-faith additions intended to verify article content and help build the encyclopedia. It is a time-accumulative service for me to go through and pro-actively update broken links, as 404's create bad user experiences. I do not appreciate your presuppositions and in the future would request that you learn to differentiate between SEO and creating a better Encyclopedia for all. Thank you.

--Schieler (talk) 04:11, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
 * When an online reference used in an article is no longer "live" (404 or other errors), we do not delete it. In most instances, an archive version of that webpage will be available on archive.org, and we add the archive-url and archive-date to the citation template. When an archived version is unavailable, examine the citation: in the cases of a magazine, journal, book, or other reference where a reader might still be able to verify the content using offline sources, simply remove the URL portion of the ref. For web-only references, append Template:Dead link. Schazjmd   (talk)  15:33, 13 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Schazjmd, thank you for the information. I always check the Wayback Machine first (Archive.org) before looking for another reference. There was no archived data for any of the 404's I have ever added reclamation links to. The only appending I have done was for web-only references. The administrator above failed to do their independent research. I appreciate the information and reminder surrounding the issue.

Schieler (talk) 16:56, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Well, I found an archive link for the reference you recently removed from Carpet cleaning, which is why it appeared to me that you were not aware of it. Schazjmd   (talk)  17:11, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Can you please show me? I was under the impression the admin above would have reverted to Archive.org if there was a page available? When I look myself, Archive.org is showing no information found for the url. Schieler
 * archived link I didn't put the ref back with the archive-url added because it did a poor job of supporting the specific content. Schazjmd   (talk)  19:27, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

I don't find your protestations above believable, as you have never added an archive-url to a reference. These are your edits that involve references:
 * Diff where you replaced a reference, claiming 404 when it is in fact available on archive.org.
 * Another diff where you replaced a reference, claiming 404 when it is in fact available on archive.org.
 * In this diff you removed the archived URL itself.
 * In this diff you again removed an archived url.
 * In this diff you replaced live refs with your preferred URL.

And then we come to the ref on carpet cleaning today, which I've already demonstrated is available on archive.org. I'd suggest you avoid editing existing references until you learn to do so correctly. Schazjmd  (talk)  19:42, 13 November 2020 (UTC)