User talk:Schilch4

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Rlendog (talk) 23:20, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

References vs: External Links
Please note the style difference and appropriate article sections for references and external links. The links you're adding to Sable Antelope and numerous other articles are not references, they're external links and should be placed in that section in each article. See Yellow Baboon for the correct format. Regards, Chuckiesdad/Talk/Contribs 05:02, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

November 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, you may not know that Wikipedia has a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Using different styles throughout the encyclopedia, as you did in Sable Antelope, makes it harder to read. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ''Please stop misplacing external links into the References sections of articles like Sable Antelope. Please review the guidelines at WP:EL.'' Chuckiesdad/Talk/Contribs 05:11, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Sable Antelope. There is a Manual of Style that should be followed. Thank you. Chuckiesdad/Talk/Contribs 05:17, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. - BanyanTree 11:16, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:BlackCreekVillageLibrary.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:BlackCreekVillageLibrary.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 05:27, 27 November 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 05:27, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:BlackCreekVillageLibrary.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:BlackCreekVillageLibrary.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Salavat (talk) 05:27, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

File:BlackCreekVillageLibrary.jpg missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:BlackCreekVillageLibrary.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:41, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Black Creek Village Library


The article Black Creek Village Library has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * A search for references failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources to comply with notability requirements. This included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals, which can be seen from the following links: Black Creek Village Library – news, books, scholar Consequently, this article is about a subject that appears to lack sufficient notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Abductive (reasoning) 08:28, 28 March 2010 (UTC)