User talk:Schlichmartin

Your submission at Articles for creation: Martin Schlichenmaier (February 8)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bkissin was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Schlichmartin/Martin Schlichenmaier and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Schlichmartin/Martin Schlichenmaier, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Schlichmartin/Martin_Schlichenmaier Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bkissin&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Schlichmartin/Martin_Schlichenmaier reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bkissin (talk) 21:23, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Martin Schlichenmaier (February 8)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CommanderWaterford was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Martin Schlichenmaier and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Martin Schlichenmaier, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Martin_Schlichenmaier Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:CommanderWaterford&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Martin_Schlichenmaier reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CommanderWaterford (talk) 21:38, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

re-submission 10.2.2021
This is the response to some remarks concerning my submission of the entry

Martin Schlichenmaier

(1) User CommanderWaterford

made the point that the references of my contribution might not be neutral. Also he/she pointed out that selfsubmitting is not encouraged. But nevertheless in my understanding it is not absolutely forbidden. Clearly, one has to strictly obey the neutrality view point.

In this case it is even not a traditional (auto)-biography but only a collection of key scientific profile data. No private information. Hence, also no points of disagreements.

Based on this (and the remarks of CommanderWaterford) I went carefully again through the submission and removed all references which might be considered as not neutral. In fact the only reference which might fall in this category was the CV. To avoid problems I erased it from the text and replaced it by some  clearly neutral references. Doing this I also erased a certain passage about the study places as for them I could not find ``neutral references''.

I like to point out the fact, that I took as some starting point of my entry, the existing entry of Ilka Agricola a fellow mathematician. Her entry is for me an excellent entry with data of relevance for the scientific community. I choose to stay as close as possible to this example.

Concerning, the general question whether my  entry will be of relevance for the scientific community: In my view this is the case. As my fellow mathematician Ilka Agricola I am working in the international community of researchers. My mathematical work is studied all over the world, I am invited to give summer school lectures on the international level, etc. Hence, I think such an entry will be very well-come (now this is of course advertisement for the entry).

(2) The user DGG:

He mentioned the citations. Triggered by his remark (thank you very much) I went through the entry and found out the very nice tool of using the citation template. I changed every information to this form, i.e. I also added doi's. I am sure now they will be more helpful for the users of wikipedia.

(3) Having done this, I will now resubmit my entry again and I hope it will find more acceptance (and luck). In case you have any explicit wishes, please do not hesitate and give me feedback.

Schlichmartin (talk) 14:40, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Martin Schlichenmaier has been accepted
 Martin Schlichenmaier, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Martin_Schlichenmaier help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! PK650 (talk) 09:29, 8 May 2021 (UTC)