User talk:SchlomoNateVeyHiggers

Welcome!
Hi SchlomoNateVeyHiggers! I noticed your contributions to Anti-Defamation League&#32;and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Happy editing! Flibbertigibbets (talk) 19:15, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

Contention and edit warring
Hi SNVH!

Generally a good idea to discuss changes with others rather than get into a back and forth - then take the discussion to talk so that a meeting of the minds can take place.

What I see

"The Anti-Defamation League was founded by B'nai B'rith as a response to attacks on Jews; the then recent contentious conviction of Leo Frank was mentioned by Adolf Kraus when he announced the creation of ADL."

When I drilled down to Leo Frank the entry described the situation as a "travesty"

Generally, I would just say that more than one word needs to be changed to provide context..

Flibbertigibbets (talk) 19:28, 20 November 2022 (UTC)


 * There are more issues. There is a lot of speculation and uncritical acceptance of unverifiable information (e.g., its ultimate purpose is; they were unaware (rather than claimed to be unaware) etc.). SchlomoNateVeyHiggers (talk) 19:32, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Agree but "Edit warring" is not going to accomplish anything. Reading through Leo Frank I might adjust the article to include this;
 * "discussing the charges of antisemitism in the trial"
 * The best thing is to move onto another subject, starting with the teahouse.. or task center.Flibbertigibbets (talk) 19:42, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

November 2022
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Cullen328 (talk) 19:37, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

November 2022
 Your account has been blocked indefinitely because your username is a clear violation of Wikipedia's username policy – it is obviously offensive, profane, violent, threatening, sexually explicit, disruptive, attacks or impersonates another person, or suggests that you do not intend to contribute positively to Wikipedia. Please see our blocking and username policies for more information. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, but users are not allowed to edit with accounts that have inappropriate usernames, and we do not tolerate 'bad faith' editing such as trolling or other disruptive behavior. If you believe that this block was incorrect or made in error, or would otherwise like to explain why you should be unblocked, you are welcome to appeal this block – read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the following text to the bottom of your user talk page here:    Cullen328 (talk) 19:42, 20 November 2022 (UTC)