User talk:Schmids/sandbox/Cultural Economics

Hi Scott!

What does the article (or section) do well? Your contribution to the Cultural Economics page is so relevant well written. I specifically appreciate how you explained the subjects that you brought up (such as in the case of systems thinking). I also appreciate you trying to connect cultural economics to something most readers are familiar with, technology. It draws the readers attention and keeps the topic relevant. In addition, all your information is well cited.

What changes would you suggest overall? I would say that overall, your article contribution is very solid however there is some room for more fluid transitions throughout.

What is the most important thing that the author could do to improve his/her contribution? I don't think there is any thing that stands out to me specifically. Perhaps when you discuss technology have a more narrower focus on cultural economics instead of just culture.

Did you glean anything from your classmate's work that could be applicable to your own? If so, let him/her know! I'm definitely gonna go back and edit my article to reflect the structure of yours with headers and bullet points even. LakshmiMod (talk) 05:34, 23 March 2017 (UTC)LakshmiMod

Hi Scott,

What does the article (or section) do well? The article is structured well and has a logical flow throughout considering the complexity of the subject. The ideas are explained clearly and it is obvious to the reader that you understand the subject well. Also, any point you make is supported by a reliable source and there is are a ton of connected articles for readers to explore when this is published. Overall, a very good first article!

What changes would you suggest overall? A graph or any visual aid world make the article a bit more digestible.

What is the most important thing that the author could do to improve his/her contribution? Some additional information regarding the current state of Cultural Economics and its application in the real world would be valuable to readers and easy to update once this article becomes older.

Very nice article, Scott!

ZiyadNour (talk) 23 March, 2017 ZiyadNour —Preceding undated comment added 21:48, 23 March 2017 (UTC)