User talk:Schnagglepuss

April 2014
Please do not remove the copyvio template from articles. Your action has been reverted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept non-free text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted, and removing copyright notices will not help your case. You can properly contest the deletion at Copyright problems. If you are the owner of the material, you may release the material under the Creative Commons and GFDL licenses, as detailed at WP:IOWN. Alternatively, you are welcome to create a draft in your own words at a temporary subpage linked from the article. If you continue to insert copyright violations and/or remove copyright notices, you may be blocked from editing. Cindy ( talk ) 10:51, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

The page has been entirely rewritten, there are no copyright violations on that page now (hopefully, assuming I've edited it correctly!) --Schnagglepuss (talk) 12:37, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Can a more experienced editor check the page I was asked to edit at Experimental Factor Ontology please? There was previously some copyright material apparently but I've rewritten that entirely. Nothing on there breaches copyright. Is there anything else I should be doing on that page to finish editing it?


 * I don't see a remaining copyvio issue, but you'd know that best. What should be improved is the sourcing for the "Scope and Access" section. Much of that content doesn't seem to be based on the given sources (or it's unclear what source it's based on). Huon (talk) 13:21, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: SciBite (September 6)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by William2001 was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:SciBite and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:SciBite, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:SciBite Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:William2001&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:SciBite reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

William2001(talk) 02:54, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:SciBite


Hello, Schnagglepuss. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "SciBite".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 19:13, 10 March 2020 (UTC)