User talk:SchnitteUK

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~, which will automatically produce your name and the date.
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or place  on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Joseph Gold (lawyer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SJD (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Manchester Journal of International Economic Law


The article Manchester Journal of International Economic Law has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No independent sources, not indexed in selective major databases. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Guillaume2303 (talk) 10:25, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Manchester Journal of International Economic Law for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Manchester Journal of International Economic Law is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Manchester Journal of International Economic Law until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Guillaume2303 (talk) 11:41, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Milton Keynes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anglo-Norman ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Milton_Keynes check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Milton_Keynes?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:20, 23 March 2020 (UTC)

Bold, revert, discuss
A key operating principle of Wikipedia is WP:Bold, revert, discuss. This means that there is no requirement to seek consensus for an edit before you make it (per WP:BEBOLD) but, if challenged per WP:BRD, you must not ignore it and reinstate your controversial edit (marginally modified). You must engage in the talk page discussion, you cannot ignore it. Through discussion, we can achieve a sensible way forward. I have accepted your fundamental point that a subsection is needed on how the name came about but not to the extent of it nor how it should be said. I am sure that we can resolve this through co-operation.

By the way, per MOS:NOTE, we don't tell readers what to think so we don't begin a sentence with "Note that..." --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 20:55, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
 * I withdrew my reversion of your second insertion because a revert war will get us nowhere. As described at talk:Milton Keynes, I have instead gone for the alternative way forward described in WP:BRD and have revised your text – to be honest a complete rewrite. But I believe that I have retained the key points of your contribution, which I accept were needed and the article is better for it. But let's use the article talk page if you wish to pursue. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 00:24, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of McKinsey Quarterly for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article McKinsey Quarterly is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/McKinsey Quarterly until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Mimi Ho Kora (talk) 22:37, 10 May 2023 (UTC)