User talk:ScholarMemf

SPA
And I suggest you read wp:editwar wp:brd and WP:ONUS. It is down to you to make a case at talk and get wp:consensus for you change. Slatersteven (talk) 16:36, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

Abd wp:or, it does hot mater what you know to be true. Slatersteven (talk) 16:42, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

Okay. This is my first time editing Wikipedia. I see that there are processes. I would like to say that while I came in assuming good faith, I also assumed that a simple correction to bring the stated assertion ,that there are no statues on public land in Maryland, more in line with what is actually stated in the article linked to as source, that all statues have been removed from courthouses and that monuments and statues remain on many battlefields and cemetaries. That is what is said in the source provided for the original assertion of total clearance of all public property of confederate statues. And it's not like it is a long article. Its 3 sentences long. So contesting that, is what brought on a doubt to the assumption of good faith. ScholarMemf (talk) 17:10, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Except the source says it might well be the last one on public land excluding cemeteries. THus what you shos have done was made a case at talk once you were reverted, and you might well have gotten (sort of) your way, without the drama. Now (by the way) the article implies that there are still statues on public land that are not battlefields or cemeteries, which may well also be false. Slatersteven (talk) 17:16, 28 December 2022 (UTC)


 * No, the section in question does not imply that at all. It does imply that there may be statues not at courthouses, which appears to be the case. --Nat Gertler (talk) 17:46, 28 December 2022 (UTC)