User talk:Scholarly fellow

August 2017
Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Brazilian Day— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Serols (talk) 17:38, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Pellinaati Pramanalu. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Shellwood (talk) 14:05, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Endtroducing....., you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Endtroducing..... was changed by Scholarly fellow (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.874486 on 2017-08-31T20:03:38+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:03, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Weezer. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Weezer was changed by Scholarly fellow (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.953543 on 2017-08-31T20:08:46+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:08, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Widr (talk) 20:24, 31 August 2017 (UTC)