User talk:Schreck59

New Paintings of Common Objects
Thanks for starting articles about artists featured in the Common Objects show. I think the show itself would benefit from an article as well! There is a repeated error in the articles however. The curator of the show was Walter Hopps, not as you have stated, John Coplans, who wrote a review of it for Artforum. Thanks, --Ethicoaestheticist 23:36, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Robert Dowd in 1987.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Robert Dowd in 1987.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Radiant chains (talk) 06:12, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mara Devereux, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arthur Johnson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Photograph of Mara Devereux by Edward Schreck.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Photograph of Mara Devereux by Edward Schreck.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:28, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Mara Devereux first Art Show, Brooklyn Museum 1934.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mara Devereux first Art Show, Brooklyn Museum 1934.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. January ( talk ) 16:17, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Fairchild Industries


The article Fairchild Industries has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "The topic is well covered on the Fairchild Aircraft page, and this really only documents a name change. It was still the same company."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.